Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30374315›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Unexplained Progressive Visual Field Loss in the Presence of Normal Retinotopic Maps.

Christina Moutsiana, Radwa Soliman, Lee de Wit, Merle James-Galton, Martin I Sereno, Gordon T Plant, D Samuel Schwarzkopf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Clinical Use of Retinotopy in Functional Hemianopia.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. False Positive Hemianopia.Case reports in ophthalmology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christina MoutsianaPsychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom.
Radwa SolimanRadio-Diagnosis, Assiut University Hospitals, Asyut, Egypt.
Lee de WitDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Merle James-GaltonNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (NHNN), London, United Kingdom.
Martin I SerenoPsychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Gordon T PlantNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (NHNN), London, United Kingdom.
D Samuel SchwarzkopfSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

Cognitive functions of multisensory cortical mapsR01MH081990 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SERENO, MARTIN IRENAEUS · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH081990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lesions of primary visual cortex or its primary inputs typically result in retinotopically localized scotomas. Here we present an individual with unexplained visual field loss and deficits in visual perception in the absence of structural damage to the early visual pathway or lesions in visual cortex. The subject, monocular from an early age, underwent repeated perimetry tests over 8 years demonstrating severe anopia of the lower hemifield, and a clockwise progression of the loss through her upper left visual field. Her visual impairment was evident in a number of standardized tests and psychophysics, especially in tasks assessing spatial integration using illusory contours. However, her intellectual ability was intact and her performance in some other tasks assessing color vision or object detection in scenes was normal. We employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), electroretinography and visually evoked potentials. Surprisingly, in contrast to the participant's severe anopia, we found no evidence of abnormal function of her early visual pathways. Specifically, we performed retinotopic mapping using population receptive field (pRF) analysis to map the functional organization of visual cortex in the anopic participant and three control participants on two occasions three and a half years apart. Despite the behavioral visual field loss, her retinotopic maps and pRF parameters in visual areas V1-V3 were qualitatively normal. Further behavioral experiments confirmed that this discrepancy was not trivially explained by the difference between stimuli used for retinotopic mapping and perimetry. Structural T1 scans were normal at both time points, and volumetric analysis of white and gray matter tissue on the segmented T1 volumes did not reveal any abnormalities or deterioration over time. Our findings suggest that normal functional organization of early visual cortex without evident structural damage to the early visual pathway as disclosed by the techniques employed in this study does not necessarily guarantee conscious perception across the visual field.

Indexed as

anopiaconscious perceptionpopulation receptive fieldretinotopyvision

Identifiers

PMID30374315
PMCPMC6196317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.