Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30374168›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2018

Microbial nitrogen limitation in the mammalian large intestine.

Aspen T Reese, Fátima C Pereira, Arno Schintlmeister, David Berry, Michael Wagner, Laura P Hale, Anchi Wu, Sharon Jiang, Heather K Durand, Xiyou Zhou and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Stability and Variability of the Human Fecal Microbiome over 2 Years in the Multiethnic Cohort Study: A Metagenomic Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Aspen T ReeseDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9004-9470
Fátima C PereiraDepartment of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Microbial Ecology, Research Network Chemistry Meets Microbiology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Arno SchintlmeisterDepartment of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Microbial Ecology, Research Network Chemistry Meets Microbiology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
David BerryDepartment of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Microbial Ecology, Research Network Chemistry Meets Microbiology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8997-608X
Michael WagnerDepartment of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Microbial Ecology, Research Network Chemistry Meets Microbiology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9778-7684
Laura P HaleDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Anchi WuDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6004-6276
Sharon JiangDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Heather K DurandDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4059-8484
Xiyou ZhouDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Richard T PremontDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8053-5026
Anna Mae DiehlDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Thomas M O'ConnellDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Susan C AlbertsDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1313-488X
Tyler R KartzinelDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8488-0580
Robert M PringleDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Robert R DunnDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Justin P WrightDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9102-5347
Lawrence A DavidDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. lawrence.david@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3570-4767
Duke University · USUniversity of Vienna · ATDuke Medical Center · USBrown University · USIndiana University School of MedicineNorth Carolina State University · USPrinceton University · US

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 26127Austrian Science Fund FWF P 27831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resource limitation is a fundamental factor governing the composition and function of ecological communities. However, the role of resource supply in structuring the intestinal microbiome has not been established and represents a challenge for mammals that rely on microbial symbionts for digestion: too little supply might starve the microbiome while too much might starve the host. We present evidence that microbiota occupy a habitat that is limited in total nitrogen supply within the large intestines of 30 mammal species. Lowering dietary protein levels in mice reduced their faecal concentrations of bacteria. A gradient of stoichiometry along the length of the gut was consistent with the hypothesis that intestinal nitrogen limitation results from host absorption of dietary nutrients. Nitrogen availability is also likely to be shaped by host-microbe interactions: levels of host-secreted nitrogen were altered in germ-free mice and when bacterial loads were reduced via experimental antibiotic treatment. Single-cell spectrometry revealed that members of the phylum Bacteroidetes consumed nitrogen in the large intestine more readily than other commensal taxa did. Our findings support a model where nitrogen limitation arises from preferential host use of dietary nutrients. We speculate that this resource limitation could enable hosts to regulate microbial communities in the large intestine. Commensal microbiota may have adapted to nitrogen-limited settings, suggesting one reason why excess dietary protein has been associated with degraded gut-microbial ecosystems.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaCarbonDietDietary ProteinsFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHost Microbial InteractionsIntestine, LargeMammalsMiceNitrogenRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSymbiosisCarbonDietary ProteinsNitrogenRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID30374168
PMCPMC6264799
OpenAlexW2895984689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.