Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30373910›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2018

Experiences With Medical Exemptions After a Change in Vaccine Exemption Policy in California.

Salini Mohanty, Alison M Buttenheim, Caroline M Joyce, Amanda C Howa, Daniel Salmon, Saad B Omer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A call for community-shared decisions.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Salini MohantyDepartment of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; smohanty@upenn.edu.
Alison M ButtenheimDepartment of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Caroline M JoyceDepartment of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Amanda C HowaHubert Department of Global Health and.
Daniel SalmonDepartment of International Health and Health Behavior Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Saad B OmerHubert Department of Global Health and.

Funding

Impact of eliminating nonmedical exemptions in CaliforniaR01AI125405 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, JASON LEE · 2016 to 2020
$3.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

: media-1vid110.1542/5804909532001PEDS-VA_2018-1051

methodsWe conducted semistructured telephone interviews between August 2017 and September 2017 with health officers and immunization staff from local health jurisdictions in California. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for key themes.

resultsWe conducted 34 interviews with 40 health officers and immunization staff representing 35 of the 61 local health jurisdictions in California. Four main themes emerged related to experiences with medical exemptions: (1) the role of stakeholders, (2) reviewing medical exemptions received by schools, (3) medical exemptions that were perceived as problematic, and (4) frustration and concern over medical exemptions. Generally, local health jurisdictions described a narrow role in providing support and technical assistance to schools. Only 5 jurisdictions actively tracked medical exemptions received by schools, with 1 jurisdiction facing a lawsuit as a result. Examples were provided of medical exemptions that listed family history of allergies and autoimmune diseases as contraindications for immunization and of physicians charging steep fees for medical exemptions. Participants also reported concerns about the increase in medical exemptions after the implementation of SB277.

conclusionsParticipants reported many challenges and concerns with medical exemptions under SB277. Without additional legal changes, including a standardized review of medical exemptions, some physicians may continue to write medical exemptions for vaccine-hesitant parents, potentially limiting the long-term impact of SB277.

Indexed as

CaliforniaChildHealth PersonnelHealth PolicyHumansParentsSchool Admission CriteriaSchoolsVaccination

Identifiers

PMID30373910
PMCPMC6314187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.