Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30373837›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Current CaCO

Olivier Sulpis, Bernard P Boudreau, Alfonso Mucci, Chris Jenkins, David S Trossman, Brian K Arbic, Robert M Key

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The dominant sink of oceanic calcium carbonate occurs in undersaturated seawater.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Probing multiscale dissolution dynamics in natural rocks through microfluidics and compositional analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olivier SulpisGEOTOP, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0E8, Canada; olivier.sulpis@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6463-3320
Bernard P BoudreauDepartment of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7748-1151
Alfonso MucciGEOTOP, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0E8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9155-6319
Chris JenkinsInstitute for Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0450.ORCID 0000-0001-7476-8723
David S TrossmanInstitute of Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1229.
Brian K ArbicDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1005.ORCID 0000-0002-7969-2294
Robert M KeyAtmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540-6654.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oceanic uptake of anthropogenic CO

Indexed as

Calcium CarbonateCarbon DioxideEcosystemHuman ActivitiesHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationOceans and SeasPacific OceanSeawaterSolubilityWaterCalcium CarbonateCarbon DioxideWateranthropogenic CO2CaCO3dissolutionocean acidificationseafloor

Identifiers

PMID30373837
PMCPMC6243283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.