Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30373766›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Integration of Small- and Wide-Field Visual Features in Target-Selective Descending Neurons of both Predatory and Nonpredatory Dipterans.

Sarah Nicholas, Jack Supple, Richard Leibbrandt, Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido, Karin Nordström

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Neural bottlenecks: axon count, distribution, and conduction in the Manduca sexta neck connective.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Facilitation of neural responses to targets moving against optic flow.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Visual motion sensitivity in descending neurons in the hoverfly.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Image statistics of the environment surrounding freely behaving hoverflies.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sarah NicholasCentre for Neuroscience, Flinders University, 5001 Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jack SuppleDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, United Kingdom.
Richard LeibbrandtCentre for Neuroscience, Flinders University, 5001 Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Paloma T Gonzalez-BellidoDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, and.ORCID 0000-0003-2201-991X
Karin NordströmCentre for Neuroscience, Flinders University, 5001 Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, karin.nordstrom@flinders.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6020-6348
Flinders University · AUUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many animals, target motion carries high ecological significance as this may be generated by a predator, prey, or potential mate. Indeed, animals whose survival depends on early target detection are often equipped with a sharply tuned visual system, yielding robust performance in challenging conditions. For example, many fast-flying insects use visual cues for identifying targets, such as prey (e.g., predatory dragonflies and robberflies) or conspecifics (e.g., nonpredatory hoverflies), and can often do so against self-generated background optic flow. Supporting these behaviors, the optic lobes of insects that pursue targets harbor neurons that respond robustly to the motion of small moving objects, even when displayed against syn-directional background clutter. However, in diptera, the encoding of target information by the descending neurons, which are more directly involved in generating the behavioral output, has received less attention. We characterized target-selective neurons by recording in the ventral nerve cord of male and female predatory

Indexed as

AnimalsDipteraFemaleMaleMotion PerceptionNeuronsOdonataOptic Lobe, NonmammalianPhotic StimulationPredatory BehaviorSpecies SpecificityVisual Fieldsdipteran TSDNmotion visionoptic flowtarget detectiontarget tracking

Identifiers

PMID30373766
PMCPMC6290295
OpenAlexW2898971696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.