Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30373720›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Support for a clade of Placozoa and Cnidaria in genes with minimal compositional bias.

Christopher E Laumer, Harald Gruber-Vodicka, Michael G Hadfield, Vicki B Pearse, Ana Riesgo, John C Marioni, Gonzalo Giribet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
28.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Early transitions in the evolution of cognition.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Long-Term Culturing of Placozoans (Trichoplax and Hoilungia).Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  16. Incongruence in the phylogenomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Christopher E LaumerWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-8516
Harald Gruber-VodickaMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.
Michael G HadfieldKewalo Marine Laboratory, Pacific Biosciences Research Center and the University of Hawaii-Manoa, Honolulu, United States.
Vicki B PearseInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, United States.
Ana RiesgoInvertebrate Division, Life Sciences Department, The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.
John C MarioniWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9092-0852
Gonzalo GiribetMuseum of Comparative Zoology, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.
European Bioinformatics Institute · GBHarvard University · USMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology · DENatural History Museum · GBUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phylogenetic placement of the morphologically simple placozoans is crucial to understanding the evolution of complex animal traits. Here, we examine the influence of adding new genomes from placozoans to a large dataset designed to study the deepest splits in the animal phylogeny. Using site-heterogeneous substitution models, we show that it is possible to obtain strong support, in both amino acid and reduced-alphabet matrices, for either a sister-group relationship between Cnidaria and Placozoa, or for Cnidaria and Bilateria as seen in most published work to date, depending on the orthologues selected to construct the matrix. We demonstrate that a majority of genes show evidence of compositional heterogeneity, and that support for the Cnidaria + Bilateria clade can be assigned to this source of systematic error. In interpreting these results, we caution against a peremptory reading of placozoans as secondarily reduced forms of little relevance to broader discussions of early animal evolution.

Indexed as

BiasPhylogenyAnimalsBase CompositionBayes TheoremCnidariaLikelihood FunctionsMetagenomeModels, GeneticPlacozoaBilateriaCnidariacompositional heterogeneityevolutionary biologyphylogenyPlacozoaTrichoplax

Identifiers

PMID30373720
PMCPMC6277202
OpenAlexW2898892386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.