Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30373575›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2018

"Wherever doctors cannot reach, the sunshine can": overcoming potential barriers to malaria elimination interventions in Haiti.

Thomas Druetz, Katherine Andrinopoulos, Louis-Marie Boulos, Michaelle Boulos, Gregory S Noland, Luccene Desir, Jean Frantz Lemoine, Thomas P Eisele

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas DruetzDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal School of Public Health, CP 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C3J7, Canada. thomas.druetz@umontreal.ca.
Katherine AndrinopoulosDepartment of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA.
Louis-Marie BoulosCentre d'Évaluation et de Recherche Appliquée, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Michaelle BoulosCentre d'Évaluation et de Recherche Appliquée, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Gregory S NolandThe Carter Center, Atlanta, USA.
Luccene DesirThe Carter Center, Atlanta, USA.
Jean Frantz LemoineMinistry of Public Health and Population, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Thomas P EiseleCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Department of Tropical Medicine, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA.
Carter Center · USTulane University · USUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1114297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaiti and the Dominican Republic, the only two Caribbean countries with endemic malaria transmission, are committed to eliminating malaria. With a Plasmodium falciparum prevalence under 1% and a highly focal transmission, the efforts towards elimination in Haiti will include several community-based interventions that must be tailored to the local sociocultural context to increase their uptake. However, little is known about local community perceptions regarding malaria and the planned elimination interventions. The aim of this study is to develop a robust understanding of how to tailor, implement and promote malaria elimination strategies in Haiti.

methodsA cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted December 2015-August 2016 in Grande-Anse and the North Department in Haiti. Data collection included key informant interviews (n = 51), in-depth interviews (n = 15) and focus group discussions (n = 14) with health workers, traditional healers, teachers, priests or pastors, informal community leaders, public officials, and community members. Following a grounded theory approach, transcripts were coded and analysed using content analysis. Coded text was sorted by the types of interventions under consideration by the malaria elimination programme.

resultsThe level of knowledge about malaria was low. Many participants noted community beliefs about malaria being caused by magical phenomena in addition to vector-borne transmission. Participants described malaria as a problem rooted in the environment, with vector control the most noted method of prevention. Though participants noted malaria a severe disease, it ranked lower than other health problems perceived as more acute. Access barriers to healthcare were described including a lack of bed nets. Some distrust about pills, tests, and foreigners in general was expressed, and in few cases linked to previous experience with malaria campaigns under dictatorial regimes.

conclusionsThere are several potential barriers and opportunities to implement community-based malaria elimination interventions in rural Haiti. Elimination efforts should include the collaboration of voodoo priests and other traditional healers, be coupled with solutions to wider community concerns or other health interventions, and learn from previous or similar programmes, such as the campaign to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. It is essential to engage with communities and gain their trust to successfully implement targeted aggressive elimination activities.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHaitiHumansMalaria, FalciparumMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsRural PopulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30373575
PMCPMC6206681
OpenAlexW2899285266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.