ArticleBMC microbiology2018
Identification and antibiotic susceptibility of lactobacilli isolated from turkeys.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of papain on some bacterial pathogens in poultry meat.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Antibiotic-induced gut microbiome remodeling reduces neuroinflammation in traumatic brain injury.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Preliminary Evaluation of the Gut Microbiota Modulatory Potential of Malaysian Kefir Water in Ageing Mice.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Gut microbiome remodeling by antibiotics reduces neuroinflammation in traumatic brain injury.Research square · 2025Article
- Exploring the Functional Potential of the Broiler Gut Microbiome Using Shotgun Metagenomics.Genes · 2025Article
- Article
- Susceptibility ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of CommensalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Functional and genomic characterization of a novel probiotic Lactobacillus johnsonii KD1 against shrimp WSSV infection.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional fermented Indian food products.Food science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- The Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2023Review
- Antibiotic resistance in potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria of fermented foods and human origin from Nigeria.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Serotypes, Antibiotic Susceptibility, Genotypic Virulence Profiles and SpaA Variants ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- New Potentially Probiotic Strains Isolated from Humans - Comparison of Properties with Strains from Probiotic Products and ATCC Collection.Polish journal of microbiology · 2022Article
- Antimicrobial resistance determinants in silage.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Virulence Profiles and Antibiotic Susceptibility ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparative Analyses of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Jejunum Microbiota of Pigs in Different Areas.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Assessing the drug resistance profiles of oral probiotic lozenges.Journal of oral microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to identify Lactobacillus isolates derived from turkeys from six Polish farms and to characterize their phenotypic and genotypic antibiotic resistance profiles.
resultsAmong 62 isolates identified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and restriction analysis of 16S rDNA, the dominant species was L. salivarius (35%), followed by L. crispatus (21%), L. ingluviei (14.5%) and L. johnsonii (10%). A high prevalence of resistance to tetracycline (68% resistant isolates), lincomycin (64.5%) and enrofloxacin (60%) among the lactobacilli tested was observed. Fewer than 50% isolates were resistant to ampicillin (47%), erythromycin (45%), streptomycin (31%), chloramphenicol (29%) and gentamicin (10%). As many as 64,5% of the isolates showed multidrug resistance. High MIC values for ampicillin (≥64 μg/ml) were usually accompanied by elevated MICs for cephalosporins (≥16 μg/ml) and high MICs for tiamulin, i.e. ≥32 μg/ml, were noted in most of the turkey lactobacilli (61%). The occurrence of resistance genes was associated with phenotypic resistance, with the exception of five phenotypically susceptible isolates that contained the tetM, tetL, ermC, ermB or cat genes. The most frequently identified were ermB (45% isolates), tetL (40%), tetW (37%) and tetM (29%), and the occurrence of lnuA (18%), cat (10%), ermC (6%), ant(6)-Ia (5%) and aadE (5%) was less frequent. The mechanism of ampicillin resistance has not been elucidated, but the results of nitrocefin test confirmed that it is not involved in the production of beta-lactamases.
conclusionsThe high rate of antibiotic resistance observed in this study indicates the need to implement the principles of rational use of antibiotics in poultry. The presence of transmissible resistant genes in lactobacilli may contribute to the development of antibiotic resistant pathogenic strains that pose a threat to both poultry and consumers. The results of these studies may be useful for committees providing guidance on antibiotic susceptibility of microorganisms in order to revise and supplement current microbiological cut-offs values within the genus Lactobacillus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.