Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30373513›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Genomic analysis of the Phalaenopsis pathogen Dickeya sp. PA1, representing the emerging species Dickeya fangzhongdai.

Jingxin Zhang, John Hu, Huifang Shen, Yucheng Zhang, Dayuan Sun, Xiaoming Pu, Qiyun Yang, Qiurong Fan, Birun Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Retrospective survey ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative Pathogenomic Analysis of Two Banana PathogenicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Genomic Comparisons and Phenotypic Diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  6. Genomic and Phenotypic Biology of Novel Strains ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jingxin ZhangKey Laboratory of New Techniques for Plant Protection in Guangdong, Institute of Plant Protection, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
John HuDepartment of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA.
Huifang ShenKey Laboratory of New Techniques for Plant Protection in Guangdong, Institute of Plant Protection, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Yucheng ZhangDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Dayuan SunKey Laboratory of New Techniques for Plant Protection in Guangdong, Institute of Plant Protection, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Xiaoming PuKey Laboratory of New Techniques for Plant Protection in Guangdong, Institute of Plant Protection, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Qiyun YangKey Laboratory of New Techniques for Plant Protection in Guangdong, Institute of Plant Protection, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Qiurong FanDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Birun LinKey Laboratory of New Techniques for Plant Protection in Guangdong, Institute of Plant Protection, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China. linbr@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2616-9296
Institute of Plant Protection · CNUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Hawaii System · US

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31300118Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2015A030312002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDickeya sp. strain PA1 is the causal agent of bacterial soft rot in Phalaenopsis, an important indoor orchid in China. PA1 and a few other strains were grouped into a novel species, Dickeya fangzhongdai, and only the orchid-associated strains have been shown to cause soft rot symptoms.

methodsWe constructed the complete PA1 genome sequence and used comparative genomics to explore the differences in genomic features between D. fangzhongdai and other Dickeya species.

resultsPA1 has a 4,979,223-bp circular genome with 4269 predicted protein-coding genes. D. fangzhongdai was phylogenetically similar to Dickeya solani and Dickeya dadantii. The type I to type VI secretion systems (T1SS-T6SS), except for the stt-type T2SS, were identified in D. fangzhongdai. The three phylogenetically similar species varied significantly in terms of their T5SSs and T6SSs, as did the different D. fangzhongdai strains. Genomic island (GI) prediction and synteny analysis (compared to D. fangzhongdai strains) of PA1 also indicated the presence of T5SSs and T6SSs in strain-specific regions. Two typical CRISPR arrays were identified in D. fangzhongdai and in most other Dickeya species, except for D. solani. CRISPR-1 was present in all of these Dickeya species, while the presence of CRISPR-2 varied due to species differentiation. A large polyketide/nonribosomal peptide (PK/NRP) cluster, similar to the zeamine biosynthetic gene cluster in Dickeya zeae rice strains, was discovered in D. fangzhongdai and D. solani. The D. fangzhongdai and D. solani strains might recently have acquired this gene cluster by horizontal gene transfer (HGT).

conclusionsOrchid-associated strains are the typical members of D. fangzhongdai. Genomic analysis of PA1 suggested that this strain presents the genomic characteristics of this novel species. Considering the absence of the stt-type T2SS, the presence of CRISPR loci and the zeamine biosynthetic gene cluster, D. fangzhongdai is likely a transitional form between D. dadantii and D. solani. This is supported by the later acquisition of the zeamine cluster and the loss of CRISPR arrays by D. solani. Comparisons of phylogenetic positions and virulence determinants could be helpful for the effective quarantine and control of this emerging species.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsBacterial Secretion SystemsBase CompositionClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsComputational BiologyConserved SequenceEnterobacteriaceaeEvolution, MolecularGene OrderGenes, BacterialMolecular Sequence AnnotationOpen Reading FramesOrchidaceaePhylogenyPlant DiseasesBacterial Secretion SystemsComparative genomicsCRISPRDickeyaNovel speciesPKs/NRPsSecretion systems

Identifiers

PMID30373513
PMCPMC6206727
OpenAlexW2899229542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.