Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30373510›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Evaluation of whole exome sequencing as an alternative to BeadChip and whole genome sequencing in human population genetic analysis.

Zoltán Maróti, Zsolt Boldogkői, Dóra Tombácz, Michael Snyder, Tibor Kalmár

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gene-based association analysis of a large patient cohort provides insights into genetics of atypical femur fractures.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Genetic Inheritance and Its Contribution to Tinnitus.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zoltán MarótiDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Health Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary. maroti.zoltan@med.u-szeged.hu.
Zsolt BoldogkőiDepartment of Medical Biology, University of Szeged, Faculty of Medicine, Szeged, Hungary.
Dóra TombáczDepartment of Medical Biology, University of Szeged, Faculty of Medicine, Szeged, Hungary.
Michael SnyderDepartment of Genetics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Tibor KalmárDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Health Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary. kalmar.tibor@med.u-szeged.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0419-2009

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the underlying genetic structure of human populations is of fundamental interest to both biological and social sciences. Advances in high-throughput genotyping technology have markedly improved our understanding of global patterns of human genetic variation. The most widely used methods for collecting variant information at the DNA-level include whole genome sequencing, which remains costly, and the more economical solution of array-based techniques, as these are capable of simultaneously genotyping a pre-selected set of variable DNA sites in the human genome. The largest publicly accessible set of human genomic sequence data available today originates from exome sequencing that comprises around 1.2% of the whole genome (approximately 30 million base pairs).

resultsTo unbiasedly compare the effect of SNP selection strategies in population genetic analysis we subsampled the variants of the same highly curated 1 K Genome dataset to mimic genome, exome sequencing and array data in order to eliminate the effect of different chemistry and error profiles of these different approaches. Next we compared the application of the exome dataset to the array-based dataset and to the gold standard whole genome dataset using the same population genetic analysis methods.

conclusionsOur results draw attention to some of the inherent problems that arise from using pre-selected SNP sets for population genetic analysis. Additionally, we demonstrate that exome sequencing provides a better alternative to the array-based methods for population genetic analysis. In this study, we propose a strategy for unbiased variant collection from exome data and offer a bioinformatics protocol for proper data processing.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenome, HumanGenomicsDatabases, GeneticEvolution, MolecularExome SequencingGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic MarkersAdmixtureBeadChipPCAPopulation geneticsWESWGS

Identifiers

PMID30373510
PMCPMC6206721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.