Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30373453›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2019

Survey of Awareness and Perceptions of Canadians on the Benefits and Risks of Clinical Trials.

Donald J Willison, Dawn P Richards, Alison Orth, Heather Harris, Susan Marlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Donald J Willison1 Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dawn P Richards2 Clinical Trials Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alison Orth3 Clinical Trials BC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Heather Harris4 Can-SOLVE CKD Network, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Susan Marlin2 Clinical Trials Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the Canadian public's perspective regarding clinical trials.

methodsWe surveyed 1602 Ontario and British Columbia residents to ascertain their understanding of and willingness to participate in clinical trials.

resultsClinical trials are regarded positively with overall perceptions that they provide societal and personal benefits. Most respondents were somewhat (49%) or very willing (19%) to participate in a clinical trial. This increased with age and level of education. It was also greater among those with poor or very poor health, those with multiple chronic conditions, and those who had previously been invited into a clinical trial, all of which were correlated with age. Still, there was room for improvement in awareness and understanding of clinical trials. Forty-three percent of those surveyed felt not very informed or not at all informed and 37% had no opinion regarding clinical trials. Respondents would most often turn to their treating physician if considering participating in a clinical trial and least often to social media.

conclusionWhile Canadians' views about clinical trials are generally positive, they are somewhat muted and a significant minority feels poorly or not at all informed. They are less willing to participate in clinical research than Americans and are roughly equivalent to Europeans. While clinicians are the top choice for learning about clinical trials, they have little or no training and little time for this role. As we move toward integrating clinical trials into the practice setting, these issues of time, training, and resources must be addressed.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAge FactorsBritish ColumbiaClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPatient ParticipationPerceptionRisk AssessmentSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesCanadaclinical trialspublic opinion

Identifiers

PMID30373453
PMCPMC6710611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.