ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2019
Survey of Awareness and Perceptions of Canadians on the Benefits and Risks of Clinical Trials.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Awareness and willingness to participate in drug clinical trials among college students: a cross-sectional study in China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Impact assessment of telehealth medical nutrition therapy for managing cardiovascular disease risk in rural and remote NSW: the Healthy Rural Hearts study.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- PROTOCOL: Comparative Effectiveness of Tools for Communicating Health Research Results to Study Participants and Others With Relevant Lived Experience: A Living Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Campbell systematic reviews · 2026Review
- Implementing a national clinical trial navigator program: a qualitative CFIR analysis of barriers and facilitators from the perspective of people with lived cancer experience.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Characteristics of clinical trials associated with appeal and return on investment to participants: a review and framework.The oncologist · 2025Review
- Understanding of Clinical Trials Among Patients With Cancer and Their Relatives.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Patient and Public Perceptions in Canada About Decentralized and Hybrid Clinical Trials: "It's About Time we Bring Trials to People".Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024Article
- Attitudes Toward Providing Open Access for Use of Biospecimens and Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- Review
- Motivators and barriers towards clinical research participation: A population-based survey from an Arab MENA country.PloS one · 2022Article
- Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: An urban multi-institution with CTSA.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Participant perception, still a major challenge to clinical research in developing countries-A mixed methods study.PloS one · 2020Article
- Perceptions Towards Medical Research Participation: A Study from Jordan.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about the Canadian public's perspective regarding clinical trials.
methodsWe surveyed 1602 Ontario and British Columbia residents to ascertain their understanding of and willingness to participate in clinical trials.
resultsClinical trials are regarded positively with overall perceptions that they provide societal and personal benefits. Most respondents were somewhat (49%) or very willing (19%) to participate in a clinical trial. This increased with age and level of education. It was also greater among those with poor or very poor health, those with multiple chronic conditions, and those who had previously been invited into a clinical trial, all of which were correlated with age. Still, there was room for improvement in awareness and understanding of clinical trials. Forty-three percent of those surveyed felt not very informed or not at all informed and 37% had no opinion regarding clinical trials. Respondents would most often turn to their treating physician if considering participating in a clinical trial and least often to social media.
conclusionWhile Canadians' views about clinical trials are generally positive, they are somewhat muted and a significant minority feels poorly or not at all informed. They are less willing to participate in clinical research than Americans and are roughly equivalent to Europeans. While clinicians are the top choice for learning about clinical trials, they have little or no training and little time for this role. As we move toward integrating clinical trials into the practice setting, these issues of time, training, and resources must be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.