Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30373317›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2018

The Current Description and Future Need for Multidisciplinary PCOS Clinics.

Wendy M Wolf, Rachel A Wattick, Olivia N Kinkade, Melissa D Olfert

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Using Chinese Medicine to Treat Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
  14. Curtailing PCOS.Pediatric research · 2020
    Review
  15. Commentary: Mendelian randomization and women's health.International journal of epidemiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wendy M WolfPhysician Assistant and Registered Dietitian at Apex Family Medicine Denver, Denver, CO 80209, USA. wendywolf02@gmail.com.
Rachel A WattickDepartment of Human Nutrition and Foods, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA. rawattick@mix.wvu.edu.
Olivia N KinkadeDepartment of Human Nutrition and Foods, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA. onk0001@mix.wvu.edu.
Melissa D OlfertDepartment of Human Nutrition and Foods, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA. Melissa.olfert@mail.wvu.edu.
West Virginia University · US

Funding

RACE &GENER DIFFERENCES IN INTRACEREBRAL &CAROTID ARTERIAL VELOCITY--AGINGZ01AG000641 · NIA · AGING · PI METTER, EARL JEFFREY · 1993 to 2003
–
West Virginia University Hatch WVA00641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS), with common symptoms of irregular menstrual cycles, ovarian cysts, and hirsutism, is thought to be the most common endocrine disorder found in women, and use of multidisciplinary teams has been shown to be effective. The purpose of this review is to determine the future need for specialized, comprehensive, multidisciplinary treatment for PCOS and the current description and efficacy of existing multidisciplinary clinics. The literature was searched using PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Medline, and the Cochrane Library. Keywords included treatment efficacy, polycystic ovary syndrome, treatment and collaboration. Results showed that while an increasing number of studies continue to come out expressing the need for multidisciplinary approaches to and clinics for the treatment of PCOS, there is still a large gap in the literature documenting actual multidisciplinary PCOS treatment facilities. The limited literature documenting the efficacy of multidisciplinary PCOS clinic have demonstrated increased weight loss, high patient satisfaction, and high retention compared to single-care providers. Data showed that these teams are most commonly made up of a combination of endocrinologists, psychologists, dietitians, gynecologists, and endocrine-specialized nurses. Data showed that there is a high degree of variability and rates of diagnosis between types of single-care providers, such as: endocrinology, dermatology, gynecology, and fertility. Individuals with PCOS are in need for specialized, individualized, and focused care from a diverse team of healthcare providers to treat PCOS comprehensively.

Indexed as

comprehensive treatmentmultidisciplinaryPCOSPCOS Clinics

Identifiers

PMID30373317
PMCPMC6262499
OpenAlexW2898127319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.