Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30373313›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Estimation of the Fe and Cu Contents of the Surface Water in the Ebinur Lake Basin Based on LIBS and a Machine Learning Algorithm.

Xianlong Zhang, Fei Zhang, Hsiang-Te Kung, Ping Shi, Ayinuer Yushanjiang, Shidan Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xianlong ZhangKey Laboratory of Smart City and Environmental of Higher Education Institute, College of Resources and Environment Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China. zhangxianlong3s@163.com.
Fei ZhangKey Laboratory of Smart City and Environmental of Higher Education Institute, College of Resources and Environment Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China. zhangfei3s@163.com.
Hsiang-Te KungDepartment of Earth Sciences, the University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA. aynur226@163.com.
Ping ShiSchool of Foreign Language, Jining Medical University, Jining 272067, China. 15276606619@163.com.
Ayinuer YushanjiangKey Laboratory of Smart City and Environmental of Higher Education Institute, College of Resources and Environment Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China. hkung@memphis.edu.
Shidan ZhuKey Laboratory of Smart City and Environmental of Higher Education Institute, College of Resources and Environment Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China. lottieshi@163.com.
National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation of China · CNJining Medical University · CNUniversity of Memphis · USXinjiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional technology for detecting heavy metals in water is time consuming and difficult and thus is not suitable for quantitative detection of large samples. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) can identify multi-state (such as solid, liquid, and gas) substances simultaneously, rapidly and remotely. In this study, water samples were collected from the Ebinur Lake Basin. The water samples were subjected to LIBS to extract the characteristic peaks of iron (Fe) and copper (Cu). Most of the quantitative analysis of LIBS rarely models and estimates the heavy metal contents in natural environments and cannot quickly determine the heavy metals in field water samples. This study creatively uses the Fe and Cu contents in water samples and the characteristics of their spectral curves in LIBS for regression modelling analysis and estimates their contents in an unknown water body by using LIBS technology and a machine learning algorithm, thus improving the detection rate. The results are as follows: (1) The Cu content of the Ebinur Lake Basin is generally higher than the Fe content, the highest Fe and Cu contents found within the basin are in the Ebinur Lake watershed, and the lowest are in the Jing River. (2) A number of peaks from each sample were found of the LIBS curve. The characteristic analysis lines of Fe and Cu were finally determined according to the intensities of the Fe and Cu characteristic lines, transition probabilities and high signal-to-background ratio (S/B). Their wavelengths were 396.3 and 324.7 nm, respectively. (3) The relative percent deviation (RPD) of the Fe content back-propagation (BP) network estimation model is 0.23, and the prediction ability is poor, so it is impossible to accurately predict the Fe content of samples. In the estimation model of BP network of Cu, the coefficient of determination (R²) is 0.8, the root mean squared error (RMSE) is 0.1, and the RPD is 1.79. This result indicates that the BP estimation model of Cu content has good accuracy and strong predictive ability and can accurately predict the Cu content in a sample. In summary, estimation based on LIBS improved the accuracy and efficiency of Fe and Cu content detection in water and provided new ideas and methods for the accurate estimation of Fe and Cu contents in water.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCopperEnvironmental MonitoringIronLakesLasersMachine LearningRegression AnalysisSpectrum AnalysisWater Pollutants, ChemicalCopperIronWater Pollutants, ChemicalestimationFe and Cu contentslaser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS)machine learning algorithm

Identifiers

PMID30373313
PMCPMC6267471
OpenAlexW2898245711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.