Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30373282›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Remote Welfare Monitoring of Rodents Using Thermal Imaging.

Carina Barbosa Pereira, Janosch Kunczik, Leonie Zieglowski, René Tolba, Ahmed Abdelrahman, Dietmar Zechner, Brigitte Vollmar, Heike Janssen, Thomas Thum, Michael Czaplik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review of Rat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carina Barbosa PereiraDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. cbarbosapere@ukaachen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1788-4562
Janosch KunczikDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. jkunczik@ukaachen.de.
Leonie ZieglowskiInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science and Experimental Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. lzieglowski@ukaachen.de.
René TolbaInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science and Experimental Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. rtolba@ukaachen.de.
Ahmed AbdelrahmanInstitute for Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Schillingallee 69a, 18057 Rostock, Germany. Ahmed.Abdelrahman@med.uni-rostock.de.
Dietmar ZechnerInstitute for Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Schillingallee 69a, 18057 Rostock, Germany. dietmar.zechner@uni-rostock.de.
Brigitte VollmarInstitute for Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Schillingallee 69a, 18057 Rostock, Germany. brigitte.vollmar@uni-rostock.de.
Heike JanssenInstitute of Molecular and Translational Therapeutic Strategies (IMTTS), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Janssen.Heike@mh-hannover.de.
Thomas ThumInstitute of Molecular and Translational Therapeutic Strategies (IMTTS), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. thum.thomas@mh-hannover.de.
Michael CzaplikDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. mczaplik@ukaachen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7118-7728

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 321137804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal research has always played a crucial role in various medical and scientific breakthroughs. They offer, inter alia, insights into diseases mechanisms, genetic predisposition to a disease, and drug therapy. However, the use of animals for medical research is a cause of major controversies and debates in modern science. To warrant high bioethical standards, new directives have been being adopted to replace animal research whenever possible, to reduce the number of animals, and to refine the procedures to minimize stress and pain. Here, we present two new approaches, based on thermal imaging (a remote and passive technology), to assess respiratory rate (RR) as well as exploratory behavior and general activity in rodents. In animal research, these parameters are gold standards for welfare assessment. The approaches were validated in a study conducted with both rats and mice. To test the feasibility of our algorithm to estimate RR, thermal videos from anesthetized rodents were acquired. The capability of the second approach to monitor activity was tested with videos of Open Field tests. Regarding RR, a high agreement between thermal imaging and gold standard (electrocardiography-derived RR) was achieved. The mean relative error averaged 0.50 ± 0.15 breaths/min and 4.55 ± 2.94 breaths/min for rats and mice, respectively. The second approach was capable of monitoring and tracking the activity of the rodents very well. This paper demonstrates that thermal imaging is a promising and relevant alternative for monitoring of RR and activity in rodents, thus contributing to the remote assessment of animal welfare.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalMiceMonitoring, PhysiologicRatsRemote Sensing TechnologyRespiratory RateThermographyTime FactorsVideo Recordinganimal researchinfrared thermographylocomotor activitymotion heat mapsremote monitoringrespiratory ratethermal imagingvital signs

Identifiers

PMID30373282
PMCPMC6263688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.