Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30373278›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Improving the Breadth of the Host's Immune Response to Lassa Virus.

Juan Carlos Zapata, Sandra Medina-Moreno, Camila Guzmán-Cardozo, Maria S Salvato

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan Carlos ZapataInstitute of Human Virology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. jczapata@ihv.umaryland.edu.
Sandra Medina-MorenoInstitute of Human Virology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. smmoreno@ihv.umaryland.edu.
Camila Guzmán-CardozoInstitute of Human Virology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. mcguzmanc13@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7139-2601
Maria S SalvatoInstitute of Human Virology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. MSalvato@ihv.umaryland.edu.

Funding

EU Commission Horizon2020 STARBIOS2 709517NIH HHS R01 AI052367, R01 AI068961, 5RC2CA149001,R21-AI074790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2017, the global Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness (CEPI) declared Lassa virus disease to be one of the world's foremost biothreats. In January 2018, World Health Organization experts met to address the Lassa biothreat. It was commonly recognized that the diversity of Lassa virus (LASV) isolated from West African patient samples was far greater than that of the Ebola isolates from the West African epidemic of 2013⁻2016. Thus, vaccines produced against Lassa virus disease face the added challenge that they must be broadly-protective against a wide variety of LASV. In this review, we discuss what is known about the immune response to Lassa infection. We also discuss the approaches used to make broadly-protective influenza vaccines and how they could be applied to developing broad vaccine coverage against LASV disease. Recent advances in AIDS research are also potentially applicable to the design of broadly-protective medical countermeasures against LASV disease.

Indexed as

B cell anergybroadly-neutralizing antibodiesconformational antigensconserved antigenscross-restrictiondominant and subdominant epitopesFc-gamma receptorsfocused immunityLassa virus disease (LVD)mimicryvaccine breadth

Identifiers

PMID30373278
PMCPMC6313495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.