ArticleJournal of vision2018
Beyond scattering and absorption: Perceptual unmixing of translucent liquids.
Article in Journal of vision, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Unsupervised learning reveals interpretable latent representations for translucency perception.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Visual discrimination of optical material properties: A large-scale study.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Crystal or jelly? Effect of color on the perception of translucent materials with photographs of real-world objects.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Low level visual features support robust material perception in the judgement of metallicity.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Translucency perception: A review.Journal of vision · 2021Review
- On the Questionable Appeal of Glossy/Shiny Food Packaging.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- If painters give you lemons, squeeze the knowledge out of them. A study on the visual perception of the translucent and juicy appearance of citrus fruits in paintings.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Material constancy in perception and working memory.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Translucence perception is not dependent on cortical areas critical for processing colour or texture.Neuropsychologia · 2019Article
- The relative contribution of color and material in object selection.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Perceiving gloss through transparency.i-PerceptionArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Is perception of translucence based on estimations of scattering and absorption of light or on statistical pseudocues associated with familiar materials? We compared perceptual performance with real and computer-generated stimuli. Real stimuli were glasses of milky tea. Milk predominantly scatters light and tea absorbs it, but since the tea absorbs less as the milk concentration increases, the effects of milkiness and strength on scattering and absorption are not independent. Conversely, computer-generated stimuli were glasses of "milky tea" in which absorption and scattering were independently manipulated. Observers judged tea concentrations regardless of milk concentrations, or vice versa. Maximum-likelihood conjoint measurement was used to estimate the contributions of each physical component-concentrations of milk and tea, or amounts of scattering and absorption-to perceived milkiness or tea strength. Separability of the two physical dimensions was better for real than for computer-generated teas, suggesting that interactions between scattering and absorption were correctly accounted for in perceptual unmixing, but unmixing was always imperfect. Since the real and rendered stimuli represent different physical processes and therefore differ in their image statistics, perceptual judgments with these stimuli allowed us to identify particular pseudocues (presumably learned with real stimuli) that explain judgments with both stimulus sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.