ArticleMedical physics2019
Predicting image properties in penalized-likelihood reconstructions of flat-panel CBCT.
Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design of Multiple Focal Spots for High-Resolution CT.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026Article
- High-resolution model-based material decomposition in dual-layer flat-panel CBCT.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Local response prediction in model-based CT material decomposition.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019Article
- Convergence criterion for MBIR based on the local noise-power spectrum: Theory and implementation in a framework for accelerated 3D image reconstruction with a morphological pyramid.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeModel-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) algorithms such as penalized-likelihood (PL) methods exhibit data-dependent and shift-variant properties. Image quality predictors have been derived to prospectively estimate local noise and spatial resolution, facilitating both system hardware design and tuning of reconstruction methods. However, current MBIR image quality predictors rely on idealized system models, ignoring physical blurring effects and noise correlations found in real systems. In this work, we develop and validate a new set of predictors using a physical system model specific to flat-panel cone-beam CT (FP-CBCT).
methodsPhysical models appropriate for integration with MBIR analysis are developed and parameterized to represent nonidealities in FP projection data including focal spot blur, scintillator blur, detector aperture effect, and noise correlations. Flat-panel-specific predictors for local spatial resolution and local noise properties in PL reconstructions are developed based on these realistic physical models. Estimation accuracy of conventional (idealized) and FP-specific predictors is investigated and validated against experimental CBCT measurements using specialized phantoms.
resultsValidation studies show that flat-panel-specific predictors can accurately estimate the local spatial resolution and noise properties, while conventional predictors show significant deviations in the magnitude and scale of the spatial resolution and local noise. The proposed predictors show accurate estimations over a range of imaging conditions including varying x-ray technique and regularization strength. The conventional spatial resolution prediction is sharper than ground truth. Using conventional spatial resolution predictor, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of local point spread function (PSF) is underestimated by 0.2 mm. This mismatch is mostly eliminated in FP-specific prediction. The general shape and amplitude of local noise power spectrum (NPS) FP-specific predictions are consistent with measurement, while the conventional predictions underestimated the noise level by 70%.
conclusionThe proposed image quality predictors permit accurate estimation of local spatial resolution and noise properties for PL reconstruction, accounting for dependencies on the system geometry, x-ray technique, and patient-specific anatomy in real FP-CBCT. Such tools enable prospective analysis of image quality for a range of goals including novel system and acquisition design, adaptive and task-driven imaging, and tuning of MBIR for robust and reliable behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.