Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30372442›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Computational discovery of dynamic cell line specific Boolean networks from multiplex time-course data.

Misbah Razzaq, Loïc Paulevé, Anne Siegel, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Jérémie Bourdon, Carito Guziolowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Boolean modelling as a logic-based dynamic approach in systems medicine.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  6. Construction and contextualization approaches for protein-protein interaction networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Robust network inference using response logic.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Misbah RazzaqUniversité de Nantes, Centrale Nantes, CNRS, Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes (LS2N UMR 6004), F-44000, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4961-6802
Loïc PaulevéLRI UMR8623, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91400 Orsay, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7219-2027
Anne SiegelInstitut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires, Rennes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6542-1568
Julio Saez-RodriguezRWTH-Aachen University, Faculty of Medicine, Joint Research Center for Computational Biomedicine, Aachen, Germany.
Jérémie BourdonUniversité de Nantes, Centrale Nantes, CNRS, Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes (LS2N UMR 6004), F-44000, Nantes, France.
Carito GuziolowskiUniversité de Nantes, Centrale Nantes, CNRS, Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes (LS2N UMR 6004), F-44000, Nantes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein signaling networks are static views of dynamic processes where proteins go through many biochemical modifications such as ubiquitination and phosphorylation to propagate signals that regulate cells and can act as feed-back systems. Understanding the precise mechanisms underlying protein interactions can elucidate how signaling and cell cycle progression occur within cells in different diseases such as cancer. Large-scale protein signaling networks contain an important number of experimentally verified protein relations but lack the capability to predict the outcomes of the system, and therefore to be trained with respect to experimental measurements. Boolean Networks (BNs) are a simple yet powerful framework to study and model the dynamics of the protein signaling networks. While many BN approaches exist to model biological systems, they focus mainly on system properties, and few exist to integrate experimental data in them. In this work, we show an application of a method conceived to integrate time series phosphoproteomic data into protein signaling networks. We use a large-scale real case study from the HPN-DREAM Breast Cancer challenge. Our efficient and parameter-free method combines logic programming and model-checking to infer a family of BNs from multiple perturbation time series data of four breast cancer cell lines given a prior protein signaling network. Because each predicted BN family is cell line specific, our method highlights commonalities and discrepancies between the four cell lines. Our models have a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.31 with respect to the testing data, while the best performant method of this HPN-DREAM challenge had a RMSE of 0.47. To further validate our results, BNs are compared with the canonical mTOR pathway showing a comparable AUROC score (0.77) to the top performing HPN-DREAM teams. In addition, our approach can also be used as a complementary method to identify erroneous experiments. These results prove our methodology as an efficient dynamic model discovery method in multiple perturbation time course experimental data of large-scale signaling networks. The software and data are publicly available at https://github.com/misbahch6/caspo-ts.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAlgorithmsCell Line, TumorHumansNeoplasmsPhosphoproteinsProtein Interaction MapsProteomicsSignal TransductionPhosphoproteins

Identifiers

PMID30372442
PMCPMC6224120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.