ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
Computational discovery of dynamic cell line specific Boolean networks from multiplex time-course data.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data driven network inference and longitudinal transcriptomics unveil dynamic regulation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia models.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- STARGATE-X: a Python package for statistical analysis on the REACTOME network.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2023Article
- From time-series transcriptomics to gene regulatory networks: A review on inference methods.PLoS computational biology · 2023Review
- Mathematical model of the cell signaling pathway based on the extended Boolean network model with a stochastic process.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Boolean modelling as a logic-based dynamic approach in systems medicine.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Construction and contextualization approaches for protein-protein interaction networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Unsupervised logic-based mechanism inference for network-driven biological processes.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Personalized logical models to investigate cancer response to BRAF treatments in melanomas and colorectal cancers.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Insights on TAM Formation from a Boolean Model of Macrophage Polarization Based on In Vitro Studies.Cancers · 2020Article
- Context-specific network modeling identifies new crosstalk in β-adrenergic cardiac hypertrophy.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Robust network inference using response logic.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein signaling networks are static views of dynamic processes where proteins go through many biochemical modifications such as ubiquitination and phosphorylation to propagate signals that regulate cells and can act as feed-back systems. Understanding the precise mechanisms underlying protein interactions can elucidate how signaling and cell cycle progression occur within cells in different diseases such as cancer. Large-scale protein signaling networks contain an important number of experimentally verified protein relations but lack the capability to predict the outcomes of the system, and therefore to be trained with respect to experimental measurements. Boolean Networks (BNs) are a simple yet powerful framework to study and model the dynamics of the protein signaling networks. While many BN approaches exist to model biological systems, they focus mainly on system properties, and few exist to integrate experimental data in them. In this work, we show an application of a method conceived to integrate time series phosphoproteomic data into protein signaling networks. We use a large-scale real case study from the HPN-DREAM Breast Cancer challenge. Our efficient and parameter-free method combines logic programming and model-checking to infer a family of BNs from multiple perturbation time series data of four breast cancer cell lines given a prior protein signaling network. Because each predicted BN family is cell line specific, our method highlights commonalities and discrepancies between the four cell lines. Our models have a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.31 with respect to the testing data, while the best performant method of this HPN-DREAM challenge had a RMSE of 0.47. To further validate our results, BNs are compared with the canonical mTOR pathway showing a comparable AUROC score (0.77) to the top performing HPN-DREAM teams. In addition, our approach can also be used as a complementary method to identify erroneous experiments. These results prove our methodology as an efficient dynamic model discovery method in multiple perturbation time course experimental data of large-scale signaling networks. The software and data are publicly available at https://github.com/misbahch6/caspo-ts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.