Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30372418›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2018

Real-time, image-based slice-to-volume registration for ultrasound-guided spinal intervention.

T De Silva, A Uneri, X Zhang, M Ketcha, R Han, N Sheth, A Martin, S Vogt, G Kleinszig, A Belzberg and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A comparison of ultrasound volume navigation, O-arm navigation, and X-ray guidance for screw placement in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a randomized controlled trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Trial
  2. [Comparison of screw placement guided by O-arm navigation and ultrasound volume navigation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. MR-guided spine interventions: time to get off the ground?Annals of translational medicine · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

T De SilvaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2882-4920
A UneriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3419-1805
X ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America.
M KetchaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America.
R HanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America.
N ShethDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America.
A MartinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America.
S VogtSiemens Healthineers XP Division, Erlangen, Germany.
G KleinszigSiemens Healthineers XP Division, Erlangen, Germany.
A BelzbergDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America.
D M SciubbaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States of America.
J H SiewerdsenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America.
Johns Hopkins University · USNeurological Surgery · USSiemens Healthineers (Germany) · DE

Funding

Intraoperative Imaging for Guidance, Patient Safety, and OR Quality AssuranceR01EB017226 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIEWERDSEN, JEFFREY H · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time fusion of magnetic resonance (MR) and ultrasound (US) images could facilitate safe and accurate needle placement in spinal interventions. We develop an entirely image-based registration method (independent of or complementary to surgical trackers) that includes an efficient US probe pose initialization algorithm. The registration enables the simultaneous display of 2D ultrasound image slices relative to 3D pre-procedure MR images for navigation. A dictionary-based 3D-2D pose initialization algorithm was developed in which likely probe positions are predefined in a dictionary with feature encoding by Haar wavelet filters. Feature vectors representing the 2D US image are computed by scaling and translating multiple Haar basis filters to capture scale, location, and relative intensity patterns of distinct anatomical features. Following pose initialization, fast 3D-2D registration was performed by optimizing normalized cross-correlation between intra- and pre-procedure images using Powell's method. Experiments were performed using a lumbar puncture phantom and a fresh cadaver specimen presenting realistic image quality in spinal US imaging. Accuracy was quantified by comparing registration transforms to ground truth motion imparted by a computer-controlled motion system and calculating target registration error (TRE) in anatomical landmarks. Initialization using a 315-length feature vector yielded median translation accuracy of 2.7 mm (3.4 mm interquartile range, IQR) in the phantom and 2.1 mm (2.5 mm IQR) in the cadaver. By comparison, storing the entire image set in the dictionary and optimizing correlation yielded a comparable median accuracy of 2.1 mm (2.8 mm IQR) in the phantom and 2.9 mm (3.5 mm IQR) in the cadaver. However, the dictionary-based method reduced memory requirements by 47×  compared to storing the entire image set. The overall 3D error after registration measured using 3D landmarks was 3.2 mm (1.8 mm IQR) mm in the phantom and 3.0 mm (2.3 mm IQR) mm in the cadaver. The system was implemented in a 3D Slicer interface to facilitate translation to clinical studies. Haar feature based initialization provided accuracy and robustness at a level that was sufficient for real-time registration using an entirely image-based method for ultrasound navigation. Such an approach could improve the accuracy and safety of spinal interventions in broad utilization, since it is entirely software-based and can operate free from the cost and workflow requirements of surgical trackers.

Indexed as

Surgery, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhantoms, ImagingSpineUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID30372418
PMCPMC6298037
OpenAlexW2896872541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.