Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30371642›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nervous and mental disease2018

Certified Peer Specialists and Older Adults With Serious Mental Illness' Perspectives of the Impact of a Peer-Delivered and Technology-Supported Self-Management Intervention.

Karen L Fortuna, Marianne Storm, John A Naslund, Philip Chow, Kelly A Aschbrenner, Matthew C Lohman, Stephen J Bartels

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Operationalizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to build and support the lived experience workforce in direct health service provision.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen L Fortuna
Marianne Storm
John A NaslundDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Philip ChowCenter for Behavioral Health and Technology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Kelly A Aschbrenner
Matthew C LohmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, Virginia.
Stephen J BartelsThe Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USUniversity of South Carolina · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Training Geriatric Mental Health Services ResearchersT32MH073553 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI BRUCE, MARTHA L · 2005 to 2019
$6.4M
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research CenterU48DP005018 · DP · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ADACHI-MEJIA, ANNA MARIA · 2014 to 2018
$5.6M
Self-Management Training and Automated Telehealth to Improve SMI Health OutcomesR01MH104555 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BARTELS, STEPHEN J · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
ACL HHS U48DP005018NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005018NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH111001NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104555NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH073553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explored the perspectives of certified peer specialists and older adults with serious mental illness on the impact of a peer-delivered medical and psychiatric self-management intervention, "PeerTECH." Transcripts from interviews with consumers with serious mental illness and a focus group with certified peer specialists who were engaged in PeerTECH were analyzed. Consumer participants (n = 8) had a mean age of 68.8 years (SD = 4.9) and included individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder (five people), schizophrenia spectrum disorders (two people), and bipolar disorder (one person). Certified peer specialists (n = 3) were aged 55 years or more. Themes included internal and external forces of accountability, confidence, internal and external locus of hope, human bonding, and peer support. This exploratory qualitative study found that human support from peers can potentially influence health behavioral change in a combined peer and technology-based medical and psychiatric illness self-management intervention.

Indexed as

Peer GroupAgedBipolar DisorderComputers, HandheldFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedSchizophreniaSelf-Management

Identifiers

PMID30371642
PMCPMC6209327
OpenAlexW2898737101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.