Observational studyCornea2019
Classification of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency Using Clinical and Confocal Grading.
Observational study in Cornea, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Limbal Epithelial Cells Detected in Stage III Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency by Multimodal Anterior Segment Imaging.American journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- [Limbal diseases].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Clinical Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques in Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- International corneal and ocular surface disease dataset for electronic health records.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Review
- Automated Image Registration Method for In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of the Corneal Sub-basal Nerve Plexus.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Advances in Cell Transplantation Therapy for Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
- Wnt activation as a potential therapeutic approach to treat partial limbal stem cell deficiency.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Latent diffusion augmentation enhances deep learning analysis of neuro-morphology in limbal stem cell deficiency.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Labial Mucosa Stem Cells: Isolation, Characterization, and Their Potential for Corneal Epithelial Reconstruction.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Human limbal epithelial stem cell regulation, bioengineering and function.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2021Review
- Limbal stem cell diseases.Experimental eye research · 2021Review
- Corneal Epithelial Thickness Measured Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography as a Diagnostic Parameter for Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.American journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency After Glaucoma Surgery.Cornea · 2020Article
- Observational study of cenegermin for the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency associated with neurotrophic keratopathy.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyArticle
- The Surgical Outcomes of Limbal Allograft Transplantation in Eyes Having Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo grade the severity of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) based on the extent of clinical presentation and central corneal basal epithelial cell density (BCD).
methodsThis is a retrospective observational comparative study of 48 eyes of 35 patients with LSCD and 9 eyes of 7 normal subjects (controls). Confocal images of the central cornea were acquired. A clinical scoring system was created based on the extent of limbal and corneal surface involvement. LSCD was graded as mild, moderate, and severe stages based on the clinical scores. The degree of BCD reduction was given a score of 0 to 3.
resultsCompared with BCD in controls, BCD decreased by 23.0%, 40.4%, and 69.5% in the mild, moderate, and severe stages of LSCD classified by the clinical scoring system, respectively. The degree of BCD reduction was positively correlated with larger limbal and corneal surface involvement and when the central visual axis was affected (all P ≤ 0.0005). Mean corrected distance visual acuity logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution was 0.0 ± 0.0 in control eyes, 0.2 ± 0.5 in mild LSCD, 0.6 ± 0.4 in moderate LSCD, and 1.6 ± 1.1 in severe LSCD (P < 0.0001). There was a significant correlation between a higher clinical score and corrected distance visual acuity logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (rho = 0.82; P < 0.0001) and a greater decrease in BCD (rho = -0.78; P < 0.0001).
conclusionsA clinical scoring system was developed to assess the extent of clinical presentation of LSCD. A classification system to grade the severity of LSCD can be established by combining the BCD score with the clinical score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.