Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30371376›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2018

Design and Validation of a Semi-Active Variable Stiffness Foot Prosthesis.

Evan M Glanzer, Peter G Adamczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Design and Characterization of the AdjuSST: An Adjustable Surface Stiffness Treadmill.IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics : a joint publication of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society and the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Design, Control, and Evaluation of a Robotic Ankle-Foot Prosthesis Emulator.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Design of an Underactuated Powered Ankle and Toe Prosthesis.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Evan M Glanzer
Peter G Adamczyk

Funding

Active Variable-Stiffness Prosthetic FootR43HD074424 · NICHD · INTELLIGENT PROSTHETIC SYSTEMS, LLC · PI ADAMCZYK, PETER G · 2015 to 2015
$157k
NICHD NIH HHS R43 HD074424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents the design and validation of a novel lower limb prosthesis called the variable stiffness foot (VSF), designed to vary its forefoot stiffness in response to user activity. The VSF is designed as a semi-active device that adjusts its stiffness once per stride during swing phases, in order to minimize size, mass, and power consumption. The forefoot keel is designed as an overhung composite beam, whose stiffness is varied by moving a support fulcrum to change the length of the overhang. Stiffness modulation is programmed in response to the gait characteristics detected through foot trajectory reconstruction based on an embedded inertial sensor. The prototype VSF has a mass of only 649 g including the battery, and a build height of 87 mm. Mechanical testing demonstrated a forefoot stiffness range of 10-32 N/mm for the prototype, a threefold range of stiffness variation. The stiffness range can be altered by changing the keel material or geometry. Actuation testing showed that the VSF can make a full-scale stiffness adjustment within three strides, and tracks moderate speed-driven variations within one swing phase. Human subjects testing demonstrated greater energy storage and return with lower stiffness settings. This capability may be useful for the modulating prosthesis energy return to better mimic human ankle function. Subjective feedback indicated clear perception by the subjects of contrasts among the stiffness settings, including interpretation of scenarios for which different settings may be beneficial. Future applications of the VSF include adapting stiffness to optimize stairs, ramps, turns, and standing.

Indexed as

Foot OrthosesProsthesis DesignAnkleBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID30371376
PMCPMC6289620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.