Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30371299›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Effect of 24-Week Fenofibrate Therapy on Circulating Markers of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Outcomes From the FAME -2 Trial.

Jenna L Pinchbeck, Joseph V Moxon, Sophie E Rowbotham, Michael Bourke, Sharon Lazzaroni, Susan K Morton, Evan O Matthews, Kerolos Hendy, Rhondda E Jones, Bernie Bourke and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Abdominal aortic aneurysm progression: A review of preclinical and clinical data.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Innovation in pathogenesis and management of aortic aneurysm.World journal of experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jenna L Pinchbeck1 The Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia.
Joseph V Moxon1 The Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia.
Sophie E Rowbotham1 The Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia.
Michael Bourke1 The Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia.
Sharon Lazzaroni1 The Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia.
Susan K Morton1 The Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia.
Evan O Matthews1 The Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia.
Kerolos Hendy1 The Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia.
Rhondda E Jones1 The Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia.
Bernie Bourke5 Gosford Vascular Services Gosford New South Wales Australia.
Rene Jaeggi1 The Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia.
Danella Favot3 Department of Vascular Surgery The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Herston Queensland Australia.
Frank Quigley6 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Mater Hospital Townsville Queensland Australia.
Jason S Jenkins3 Department of Vascular Surgery The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Herston Queensland Australia.
Christopher M Reid7 School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Ramesh Velu1 The Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia.
Jonathan Golledge1 The Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia.
James Cook University · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUGosford Hospital · AUMonash University · AUTownsville Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background There is no drug therapy for abdominal aortic aneurysm ( AAA ). FAME-2 (Fenofibrate in the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm 2) was a placebo-controlled randomized trial designed to assess whether administration of 145 mg of fenofibrate/d for 24 weeks favorably modified circulating markers of AAA. Methods and Results Patients with AAA s measuring 35 to 49 mm and no contraindication were randomized to fenofibrate or identical placebo. The primary outcome measures were the differences in serum osteopontin and kallistatin concentrations between groups. Secondary analyses compared changes in the circulating concentration of AAA -associated proteins, and AAA growth, between groups using multivariable linear mixed-effects modeling. A total of 140 patients were randomized to receive fenofibrate (n=70) or placebo (n=70). By the end of the study 3 (2.1%) patients were lost to follow-up and 18 (12.9%) patients had ceased trial medication. A total of 85% of randomized patients took ≥80% of allocated tablets and were deemed to have complied with the medication regimen. Patients' allocated fenofibrate had expected reductions in serum triglycerides and estimated glomerular filtration rate, and increases in serum homocysteine. No differences in serum osteopontin, kallistatin, or AAA growth were observed between groups. Conclusions Administering 145 mg/d of fenofibrate for 24 weeks did not significantly reduce serum concentrations of osteopontin and kallistatin concentrations, or rates of AAA growth in this trial. The findings do not support the likely benefit of fenofibrate as a treatment for patients with small AAA s. Clinical Trial Registration URL : www.anzctr.org.au . Unique identifier: ACTRN 12613001039774.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAorta, AbdominalAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalBiomarkersDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFenofibrateFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypolipidemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedOsteopontinSerpinsBiomarkersFenofibrateHypolipidemic AgentskallistatinOsteopontinSerpinsabdominal aortic aneurysmbiomarkersclinical trialFenofibrate

Identifiers

PMID30371299
PMCPMC6404864
OpenAlexW2893119877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.