Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30371278›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Average Clinician-Measured Blood Pressures and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Ischemic Heart Disease in the EXAMINE Trial.

William B White, Fatima Jalil, William C Cushman, George L Bakris, Richard Bergenstal, Simon R Heller, Yuyin Liu, Cyrus Mehta, Faiez Zannad, Christopher P Cannon

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Influence of sex, age and race on coronary and heart failure events in patients with diabetes and post-acute coronary syndrome.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

William B White1 University of Connecticut School of Medicine Farmington CT.
Fatima Jalil1 University of Connecticut School of Medicine Farmington CT.
William C Cushman2 Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center University of Tennessee Health Science Center Memphis TN.
George L Bakris3 University of Chicago Medicine Chicago IL.
Richard Bergenstal4 Park Nicolett Clinic St. Louis Park MN.
Simon R Heller5 University of Sheffield United Kingdom.
Yuyin Liu6 Baim Clinical Research Institute Boston MA.
Cyrus Mehta7 Harvard School of Public Health Boston MA.
Faiez Zannad8 Université de Lorraine Nancy France.
Christopher P Cannon6 Baim Clinical Research Institute Boston MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Blood pressure ( BP ) treatment goals in patients with diabetes mellitus and increased cardiovascular risk remain controversial. Our study objective was to determine cardiovascular outcomes according to achieved BP s over the average follow-up period in the EXAMINE (Examination of Cardiovascular Outcomes With Alogliptin Versus Standard of Care) trial. Methods and Results EXAMINE was a cardiovascular outcomes trial in 5380 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and recent acute coronary syndromes. Risks of major adverse cardiac events and cardiovascular death or heart failure were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model with adjustment for baseline covariates in 10-mm Hg increments of clinician-measured systolic BP from ≤100 to >160 mm Hg and diastolic BP from ≤60 to >100 mm Hg averaged during the 24 months after randomization. Based on 2015 guidelines from the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association and the American Society of Hypertension and 2017 American Diabetes Association guidelines, systolic BP s of 131 to 140 mm Hg and diastolic BP s of 81 to 90 mm Hg were the reference groups. A U-shaped relationship between cardiovascular outcomes and BP s was observed. Importantly, compared with the systolic BP reference group, adjusted hazard ratios for major adverse cardiac events and cardiovascular death or heart failure were significantly higher in patients with systolic BP s <130 mm Hg. Similarly, compared with the diastolic BP reference group, adjusted hazard ratios for major adverse cardiac events and for cardiovascular death or heart failure were significantly higher for diastolic BP s <80 mm Hg. Conclusions In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and recent acute coronary syndrome, average BP s <130/80 mm Hg were associated with worsened cardiovascular outcomes. These data suggest that intensive control of BP in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and ischemic heart disease should be evaluated in a prospective randomized trial. Clinical Trial Registration URL : https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 00968708.

Indexed as

AgedAnalysis of VarianceBlood Pressure DeterminationCause of DeathDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic CardiomyopathiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansHypertensionHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaalogliptinHypoglycemic AgentsPiperidinesUracilblood pressurecardiovascular outcomesdiabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID30371278
PMCPMC6474950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.