Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30371269›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Underutilization of Evidence-Based Smoking Cessation Support Strategies Despite High Smoking Addiction Burden in Peripheral Artery Disease Specialty Care: Insights from the International PORTRAIT Registry.

Krishna K Patel, Philip G Jones, Edward F Ellerbeck, Donna M Buchanan, Paul S Chan, Christina M Pacheco, Gregory Moneta, John A Spertus, Kim G Smolderen

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. A modern day perspective on smoking in peripheral artery disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Krishna K Patel1 Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute University of Missouri-Kansas City MO.
Philip G Jones1 Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute University of Missouri-Kansas City MO.
Edward F Ellerbeck2 University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City KS.
Donna M Buchanan1 Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute University of Missouri-Kansas City MO.
Paul S Chan1 Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute University of Missouri-Kansas City MO.
Christina M Pacheco1 Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute University of Missouri-Kansas City MO.
Gregory Moneta3 Oregon Health Sciences University Portland OR.
John A Spertus1 Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute University of Missouri-Kansas City MO.
Kim G Smolderen1 Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute University of Missouri-Kansas City MO.
University of Missouri–Kansas City · USSaint Luke's Hospital · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Smoking is the most important risk factor for peripheral artery disease ( PAD ). Smoking cessation is key in PAD management. We aimed to examine smoking rates and smoking cessation interventions offered to patients with PAD consulting a vascular specialty clinic; and assess changes in smoking behavior over the year following initial visit. Methods and Results A total of 1272 patients with PAD and new or worsening claudication were enrolled at 16 vascular specialty clinics (2011-2015, PORTRAIT (Patient-Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories) registry). Interviews collected smoking status and cessation interventions at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Among smokers, transition state models analyzed smoking transitions at each time point and identified factors associated with quitting and relapse. On presentation, 474 (37.3%) patients were active, 660 (51.9%) former, and 138 (10.8%) never smokers. Among active smokers, only 16% were referred to cessation counseling and 11% were prescribed pharmacologic treatment. At 3 months, the probability of quitting smoking was 21%; among those continuing to smoke at 3 months, the probability of quitting during the next 9 months varied between 11% and 12% ( P<0.001). The probability of relapse among initial quitters was 36%. At 12 months, 72% of all smokers continued to smoke. Conclusions More than one third of patients with claudication consulting a PAD provider are active smokers and few received evidence-based cessation interventions. Patients appear to be most likely to quit early in their treatment course, but many quickly relapse and 72% of all patients smoking at baseline are still smoking at 12 months. Better strategies are needed to provide continuous cessation support. Clinical Trial Registration URL : https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01419080.

Indexed as

AgedAnalysis of VarianceCigarette SmokingFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIntermittent ClaudicationMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Arterial DiseaseProspective StudiesRegistriesRisk FactorsSmoking CessationSocial Supportperipheral arterial diseasesmoking

Identifiers

PMID30371269
PMCPMC6474973
OpenAlexW2894937936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.