Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30371184›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Short-Term Safety of Nicotine Replacement in Smokers Hospitalized With Coronary Heart Disease.

Quinn R Pack, Aruna Priya, Tara C Lagu, Penelope S Pekow, Auras Atreya, Nancy A Rigotti, Peter K Lindenauer

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Tobacco Use Disorder.The Medical clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Quinn R Pack1 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Baystate Medical Center Springfield MA.
Aruna Priya3 Institute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science Springfield MA.
Tara C Lagu2 Department of Internal Medicine Baystate Medical Center Springfield MA.
Penelope S Pekow3 Institute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science Springfield MA.
Auras Atreya1 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Baystate Medical Center Springfield MA.
Nancy A Rigotti7 Department of Medicine Tobacco Research and Treatment Center Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston MA.
Peter K Lindenauer2 Department of Internal Medicine Baystate Medical Center Springfield MA.
Baystate Health · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USBaystate Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Defining Optimal Clinical Strategies for Critically Ill Heart Failure PatientsK01HL114745 · NHLBI · BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. · PI LAGU, TARA C · 2013 to 2017
$721k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL114745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Little is known about the safety of nicotine replacement therapy ( NRT ) in smokers hospitalized with coronary heart disease. Methods and Results We examined the short-term safety of NRT use among smokers hospitalized for coronary heart disease in a geographically and structurally diverse sample of US hospitals in the year 2014. We compared smokers who started NRT in the first 2 days of hospitalization with smokers without any exposure to NRT and adjusted for baseline differences through propensity score matching. Outcomes included inpatient mortality, hospital length of stay, and 1-month readmission. From 270 hospitals, we included 27 459 smokers (mean age, 58 years; 69% men; 56.9% in intensive care unit), of whom 4885 (17.8%) received NRT (97.2% used the nicotine patch, at a median dose of 21 mg/d for 3 days). After propensity matching, covariates were well balanced within each patient group. Among patients with myocardial infarction, compared with patients who did not receive NRT , those who received NRT showed no difference in mortality (2.1% versus 2.3%; P=0.98), mean length of stay (4.4±3.5 versus 4.3±3.3 days; P=0.60), or 1-month readmission (15.8% versus 14.6%; P=0.31). Results were similar for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery. Conclusions Among smokers hospitalized for treatment of coronary heart disease, use of NRT was not associated with any differences in short-term outcomes. Given the known beneficial effects of NRT in treating nicotine withdrawal, reducing cravings, and promoting smoking cessation after discharge, our findings suggest that NRT is a safe and reasonable treatment option.

Indexed as

AgedCoronary DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotineRetrospective StudiesSmokersSmoking CessationTime FactorsTobacco Use Cessation DevicesTreatment OutcomeNicotinecoronary bypass surgerymyocardial infarctionnicotine PatchNicotine Replacement Therapypercutaneous coronary interventionsafetysmoking

Identifiers

PMID30371184
PMCPMC6222950
OpenAlexW2889810368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.