ArticleElectrophoresis2019
On-chip pressure generation using a gel membrane fabricated outside of the microfluidic network.
Article in Electrophoresis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
On-chip generation of pressure gradients via electrokinetic means can offer several advantages to microfluidic assay design and operation in a variety of applications. In this article, we describe a simple approach to realizing this capability by employing a polyacrylamide-based gel structure fabricated within a fluid reservoir located at the terminating end of a microchannel. Application of an electric field across this membrane has been shown to block a majority of the electroosmotic flow generated within the open duct yielding a high pressure at the channel-membrane junction. Experiments show the realization of higher pressure-driven velocities in an electric field-free separation channel integrated to the micropump with this design compared to other similar micropumps described in the literature. In addition, the noted velocity was found to be less sensitive to the extent of Debye layer overlap in the channel network, and therefore more impressive when working with background electrolytes having higher ionic strengths. With the current system, pressure-driven velocities up to 3.6 mm/s were realized in a 300-nm-deep separation channel applying a maximum voltage of 3 kV at a channel terminal. To demonstrate the separative performance of our device, a nanofluidic pressure-driven ion-chromatographic analysis was subsequently implemented that relied on the slower migration of cationic analytes relative to the neutral and anionic ones in the separation channel likely due to their strong electrostatic interaction with the channel surface charges. A mixture of amino acids was thus separated with resolutions greater than those reported by our group for a similar analysis previously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.