Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30370851›Full record

ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2019

Placebo Effect in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Placebo Response and Placebo Responders in OCD: The Trend Over Time.

Georgios D Kotzalidis, Antonio Del Casale, Maurizio Simmaco, Lucia Pancheri, Roberto Brugnoli, Marco Paolini, Ida Gualtieri, Stefano Ferracuti, Valeria Savoja, Ilaria Cuomo and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Tourette syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Why hierarchical dimensional approaches to classification will fail to transform diagnosis in psychiatry.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Georgios D KotzalidisNeurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs (NESMOS) Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Antonio Del CasaleNeurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs (NESMOS) Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Maurizio SimmacoNeurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs (NESMOS) Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Lucia PancheriSocietà Psicoanalitica Italiana (SPI), Roma, Italy.
Roberto BrugnoliNeurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs (NESMOS) Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Marco PaoliniResidency School in Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Ida GualtieriResidency School in Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Stefano FerracutiDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Valeria SavojaASL Roma 4, Civitavecchia (Roma), Italy.
Ilaria CuomoASL Roma 1, Istituto Penitenziario Regina Caeli, Rome, Italy.
Lavinia De ChiaraNeurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs (NESMOS) Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Alessio MoscaNeurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs (NESMOS) Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Gabriele SaniNeurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs (NESMOS) Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Paolo GirardiNeurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs (NESMOS) Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Maurizio PompiliNeurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs (NESMOS) Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Chiara RapinesiNeurosciences, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs (NESMOS) Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
On Behalf Of The Sapienza Group For The Study Of The Placebo Effect In Psychiatric Disorders

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlacebo response appears to be increasing in antidepressant, antipsychotic and various internal medicine trials. A similar trend has been reported for OCD during 1989-1999. Placebo response is generally considered as the extent to which placebo treatment is associated with core symptom improvement. In this analysis, we used Joinpoint regression to assess the time trend of both placebo response and placebo responder rates according to the year of publication with no time restriction in OCD drug trials.

methodsWe included drug and/or psychotherapy trials vs. placebo from PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO retrieved through the search (placebo OR sham) AND (obsessive* OR OCD). We included studies through investigator consensus. We then performed on data of included studies log-linear joinpoint segmented regression models using a p<0.05 cutoff.

resultsWe included 113 studies from 112 published papers. Placebo mean annual response rates in OCD studies significantly increased from 1991 to 2017 with an annual percent change (APC) of 0.66%, while placebo mean annual responder rates also significantly increased from 2010 to 2017, with an APC of 5.45%. Drug mean annual response rates in OCD studies significantly increased from 1987 to 2012 with an APC of 0.72%, while the corresponding responder rates did not show statistically significant APC changes between 1984 and 2017.

conclusionWe observed a tendency for placebo to increase both measures of response in OCD clinical drug trials through the years that tend to approximate the responses shown by drugs. Changes in the type of study (moving from classical head to head comparisons to add-on studies in treatmentresistant populations) and countries involved in experimentation may partially account for some portion of these results. It appears that placebo effects are becoming more elusive and out of control.

Indexed as

Placebo EffectAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsHumansObsessive-Compulsive DisorderSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsObsessive-compulsive disorderplacebo effectplacebo responsepublication year.

Identifiers

PMID30370851
PMCPMC7059157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.