Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30370833›Full record

ArticleWomen's health (London, England)

Sex/gender bias in the management of chest pain in ambulatory care.

Christelle Clerc Liaudat, Paul Vaucher, Tommaso De Francesco, Nicole Jaunin-Stalder, Lilli Herzig, François Verdon, Bernard Favrat, Isabella Locatelli, Carole Clair

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christelle Clerc Liaudat1 Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Paul Vaucher2 Unit of Traffic Medicine and Psychology, University Centre of Legal Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tommaso De Francesco1 Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicole Jaunin-Stalder1 Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lilli Herzig5 Institute of Family Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
François Verdon5 Institute of Family Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bernard Favrat1 Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Isabella Locatelli1 Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Carole Clair1 Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5281-0943

Funding

Project 3: Medically-based Protection of the Ovarian Reserve Against Anti-CancerP50HD076188 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WOODRUFF, TERESA K · 2014 to 2017
$6.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD076188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the main cause of death worldwide and despite a higher prevalence in men, mortality from CVD is higher among women. Few studies have assessed sex differences in chest pain management in ambulatory care. The objective of this post hoc analysis of data from a prospective cohort study was to assess sex differences in the management of chest pain in ambulatory care.

settingWe used data from the Thoracic Pain in Community cohort study that was realized in 58 primary care practices and one university ambulatory clinic in Switzerland.

participantsIn total, 672 consecutive patients aged over 16 years attending a primary care practice or ambulatory care clinic with a complaint of chest pain were included between February and June 2001. Their mean age was 55.2 years and 52.5% were women.

main outcome measuresThe main outcome was the proportion of patients referred to a cardiologist at 12 months follow-up. A panel of primary care physicians assessed the final diagnosis retained for chest pain at 12 months.

resultsThe prevalence of chest pain of cardiovascular origin (n = 108, 16.1%) was similar for men and women (17.5% vs 14.8%, respectively, p = 0.4). Men with chest pain were 2.5 times more likely to be referred to a cardiologist than women (16.6% vs 7.4%, odds ratio: 2.49, 95% confidence interval: 1.52-4.09). After adjustment for the patients' age and cardiovascular disease risk factors, the estimates did not significantly change (odds ratio: 2.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-3.78).

conclusionAlthough the same proportion of women and men present with a chest pain of cardiovascular origin in ambulatory care, there is a strong sex bias in their management. These data suggest that effort must be made to assure equity between men and women in medical care.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAttitude to HealthChest PainCohort StudiesCoronary DiseaseFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMedical History TakingMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationSex Factorsambulatory carechest painsex differencessex/gender bias

Identifiers

PMID30370833
PMCPMC6300868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.