ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Sex/gender bias in the management of chest pain in ambulatory care.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender, Gender Role Beliefs, and Evaluation of Pain in Others: Indirect and Moderated Pathways.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
- Identifying and mitigating bias in multiple aspects of modern clinical research.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Sex Differences Among Patients Treated With Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.Pulmonary circulation · 2025Article
- Gender disparities in delayed angina diagnosis: insights from 2001-2020 NHANES data.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Chest pain in a multi-ethnic population: A community-based study on sex differences in chest pain prevalence and care contacts.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
- Inconsistency in UK Biobank Event Definitions From Different Data Sources and Its Impact on Bias and Generalizability: A Case Study of Venous Thromboembolism.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Real-world evaluation of an algorithmic machine-learning-guided testing approach in stable chest pain: a multinational, multicohort study.European heart journal. Digital health · 2024Article
- Machine Learning and Bias in Medical Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2024Review
- Gender Bias in Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Project Inclusive Genetics: Protecting reproductive autonomy from bias via prenatal patient-centered counseling.HGG advances · 2023Article
- An adversarial training framework for mitigating algorithmic biases in clinical machine learning.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Gender-Related Discrepancies in Short-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluating and mitigating bias in machine learning models for cardiovascular disease prediction.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Article
- Sex differences in patterns of referral and resource utilization in the cardiology clinic: an outpatient analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Gender and sex bias in prevention and clinical treatment of women's chronic pain: hypotheses of a curriculum development.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Brief online implicit bias education increases bias awareness among clinical teaching faculty.Medical education online · 2022Article
- Sex-Related Differences in Short-Term Outcomes after Mobile VA-ECMO Implantation: Five-Year Experience of an ECMO Retrieval Program.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Gender Particularities and Prevalence of Atypical Clinical Presentation in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Article
- Sex related inequalities in the management and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome in Switzerland: cross sectional study.BMJ medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the main cause of death worldwide and despite a higher prevalence in men, mortality from CVD is higher among women. Few studies have assessed sex differences in chest pain management in ambulatory care. The objective of this post hoc analysis of data from a prospective cohort study was to assess sex differences in the management of chest pain in ambulatory care.
settingWe used data from the Thoracic Pain in Community cohort study that was realized in 58 primary care practices and one university ambulatory clinic in Switzerland.
participantsIn total, 672 consecutive patients aged over 16 years attending a primary care practice or ambulatory care clinic with a complaint of chest pain were included between February and June 2001. Their mean age was 55.2 years and 52.5% were women.
main outcome measuresThe main outcome was the proportion of patients referred to a cardiologist at 12 months follow-up. A panel of primary care physicians assessed the final diagnosis retained for chest pain at 12 months.
resultsThe prevalence of chest pain of cardiovascular origin (n = 108, 16.1%) was similar for men and women (17.5% vs 14.8%, respectively, p = 0.4). Men with chest pain were 2.5 times more likely to be referred to a cardiologist than women (16.6% vs 7.4%, odds ratio: 2.49, 95% confidence interval: 1.52-4.09). After adjustment for the patients' age and cardiovascular disease risk factors, the estimates did not significantly change (odds ratio: 2.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-3.78).
conclusionAlthough the same proportion of women and men present with a chest pain of cardiovascular origin in ambulatory care, there is a strong sex bias in their management. These data suggest that effort must be made to assure equity between men and women in medical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.