ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018
Does financial development promote the win-win balance between environmental protection and economic growth?
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Financial development and environmental quality: Does the financial environmental Kuznets Curve Prevail in Australia?Heliyon · 2024Article
- Impact of financial development and technological innovation on the volatility of green growth-evidence from China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Innovation and environmental total factor productivity in China: the moderating roles of economic policy uncertainty and marketization process.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Study on the interactive influence between economic growth and environmental pollution.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Existing studies have analyzed the effects of financial development on economic growth and environmental pollution respectively, but few studies have analyzed the effects of financial development on economic growth and environmental protection from a unified framework. This paper reports on a study which took the 28 provinces of China, for the years 2002-2014, as its research object. It used green efficiency to measure the win-win balance between economic growth and environmental protection. It divided green efficiency into economic efficiency and environmental efficiency and then studied the effects of financial development on economic growth and environmental protection within a unified framework. The primary findings indicate that (1) overall, financial development is conducive to obtaining the win-win balance in China's economy, with its positive effects on economic growth being more significant than on environmental protection; (2) capital market development promotes both economic growth and environmental protection, while also playing a significant role in the win-win balance of China's economy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30370466What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.