ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology
The impact of radiation treatment planning technique on unplanned hospital admissions.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dosimetric evaluation of a spinal cord dose-limiting 3D-CRT technique for radiotherapy of spinal metastases.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Analysis of unplanned hospital readmissions up to 2-years after metastatic spine tumour surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTreatment burdens and toxicities related to palliative radiation therapy (RT) may lead to unplanned hospital admissions (UHAs). The likelihood for these toxicities may be related to treatment technique. We compared rates of UHA between patients receiving nonconformal (2-dimensional) and conformal (3-dimensional or higher) radiation treatments to bone metastases involving the vertebral column. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with RT for bone metastases at a single tertiary care center between 2010 and 2017. We compared rates of RT-related UHA within 90 days of receiving radiation using Cox competing risk regression models.
resultsWe identified 326 patients with bone metastases involving the vertebral column, 139 of whom received radiation by nonconformal technique and 187 by conformal technique. On multivariable analysis, conformal techniques were associated with a reduced risk of 90-day UHA (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.88). Other significant factors include hematologic cancer (HR: 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.82) and baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥2 (HR: 3.02; 95% CI, 1.05-8.69).
conclusionsThe utilization of conformal (non-2-dimensional) radiation treatment plans may help reduce treatment-related toxicities and consequently UHAs after palliation of bone metastases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.