Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30370358›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Re-irradiation for malignant glioma: Toward patient selection and defining treatment parameters for salvage.

Colette J Shen, Megan N Kummerlowe, Kristin J Redmond, Juan Carlos Martinez-Gutierrez, Syed Muhammad Usama, Matthias Holdhoff, Stuart A Grossman, John J Laterra, Roy E Strowd, Lawrence R Kleinberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Re-irradiation for high-grade gliomas: Has anything changed?World journal of clinical oncology · 2021
    Review
  16. High-dose salvage re-irradiation for recurrent/progressive adult diffuse glioma: healing or hurting?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Colette J ShenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Megan N KummerloweDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kristin J RedmondDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Juan Carlos Martinez-GutierrezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Syed Muhammad UsamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Matthias HoldhoffDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Stuart A GrossmanDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
John J LaterraDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Roy E StrowdDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lawrence R KleinbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReirradiation for recurrent glioma remains controversial without knowledge of optimal patient selection, dose, fractionation, and normal tissue tolerances. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes and toxicity after conventionally fractionated reirradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma, along with the impact of concurrent chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients reirradiated for high-grade glioma recurrence between 2007 and 2016 (including patients with initial low-grade glioma). Outcome metrics included overall survival (OS), prognostic factors for survival, and treatment-related toxicity.

resultsPatients (n = 118; median age 47 years; median Karnofsky performance status score: 80) were re-treated at a median of 28 months (range, 5-214 months) after initial radiation therapy. The median reirradiation dose was 41.4 Gy (range, 12.6-54.0 Gy) to a median lesion volume of 202 cm

conclusionsSalvage reirradiation, even at doses >41.4 Gy in conventional fractionation, along with chemotherapy, was safe and well tolerated with meaningful survival duration. These data provide information that may be useful in implementing safe reirradiation treatments for appropriately selected patients and guiding future studies to define optimal reirradiation doses, maximal safe doses to critical structures, and the role of systemic therapy.

Identifiers

PMID30370358
PMCPMC6200913
OpenAlexW2862798424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.