Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30370356›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Brain metastases with poor vascular function are susceptible to pseudoprogression after stereotactic radiation surgery.

Ingrid Digernes, Endre Grøvik, Line B Nilsen, Cathrine Saxhaug, Oliver Geier, Edmund Reitan, Dag Ottar Sætre, Birger Breivik, Timothy Reese, Kari Dolven Jacobsen and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03458455 (Improved Therapy Response Assessment in Metastatic Brain Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03458455 unknown statusnot on this map

Improved Therapy Response Assessment in Metastatic Brain Tumors

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorOslo University HospitalRan2013 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsBrain MetastasesArmsMagnetic Resonance Imaging, Stereotactic Radiosurgery, Ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ingrid DigernesDepartment of Diagnostic Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Endre GrøvikDepartment of Diagnostic Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Line B NilsenDepartment of Diagnostic Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Cathrine SaxhaugDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Oliver GeierDepartment of Diagnostic Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Edmund ReitanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Dag Ottar SætreDepartment of Radiology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Kalnes, Norway.
Birger BreivikDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of Southern Norway, Kristiansand, Norway.
Timothy ReeseAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kari Dolven JacobsenDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Åslaug HellandDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kyrre Eeg EmblemDepartment of Diagnostic Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to investigate the hemodynamic status of cerebral metastases prior to and after stereotactic radiation surgery (SRS) and to identify the vascular characteristics that are associated with the development of pseudoprogression from radiation-induced damage with and without a radionecrotic component. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-four patients with 29 metastases from non-small cell lung cancer or malignant melanoma received SRS with dose of 15 Gy to 25 Gy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were acquired prior to SRS, every 3 months during the first year after SRS, and every 6 months thereafter. On the basis of the follow-up MRI scans or histology after SRS, metastases were classified as having response, tumor progression, or pseudoprogression. Advanced perfusion MRI enabled the estimation of vascular status in tumor regions including fractions of abnormal vessel architecture, underperfused tissue, and vessel pruning.

resultsPrior to SRS, metastases that later developed pseudoprogression had a distinct poor vascular function in the peritumoral zone compared with responding metastases (

conclusionsOur results suggest that the vascular status of peritumoral tissue prior to SRS plays a defining role in the development of pseudoprogression and that advanced perfusion MRI may provide new insights into patients' susceptibility to radiation-induced effects.

Identifiers

PMID30370356
PMCPMC6200880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.