ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2018
Non-invasive ventilation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathophysiology and Perioperative Considerations for Heart Failure Patients.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Predictor of Mortality in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Results of Explainable Deep Learning-Based Survival Analysis from a 15-Year Follow-Up.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Arterial Blood Gas and Electrolyte Analyses in Heart Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Respiratory Support in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema: Clinical Insights from Cardiology and Intensive Care.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- PaCOFrontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Derivation and validation of a simple prognostic risk score to predict short-term mortality in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: the SABIHA score.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Role of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Elderly Patients: Therapeutic Opportunity or Medical Futility? An Updated Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Prevalence and Economic Impact of Acute Respiratory Failure in the Prehospital Emergency Medical Service of the Madrid Community: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Effect of different CPAP levels on ultrasound-assessed lung aeration and gas exchange in neonates.Respiratory research · 2024Observational
- Remifentanil vs. dexmedetomidine for cardiac surgery patients with noninvasive ventilation intolerance: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Journal of intensive care · 2024Article
- Noninvasive respiratory support in the emergency department: Controversies and state-of-the-art recommendations.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Review
- Flash Pulmonary Oedema Secondary to Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Acute Systolic Heart Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Potential rebreathing of carbon dioxide during noninvasive ventilation provided by critical care ventilator.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2022Article
- Obstructive sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease, a story of confounders!Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2020Review
- Remifentanil versus dexmedetomidine for treatment of cardiac surgery patients with moderate to severe noninvasive ventilation intolerance (REDNIVIN): a prospective, cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Article
- Non-Invasive Ventilatory Support In the Elderly.Current geriatrics reports · 2019Article
- Dexmedetomidine Improves Cardiovascular and Ventilatory Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: Basic and Clinical Approaches.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) is among the most common causes of acute respiratory failure (ARF) in the acute care setting and often requires ventilatory assistance. In patients with ARF due to CPE, use of non-invasive positive airway pressure can decrease the systemic venous return and the left ventricular (LV) afterload, thus reducing LV filling pressure and limiting pulmonary edema. In these patients, either non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can improve vital signs and physiological parameters, decreasing the need for endotracheal intubation (ETI) and hospital mortality when compared to conventional oxygen therapy. Results on the use of NIV or CPAP in patients with CPE prior to hospitalization are not homogeneous among studies, hampering any conclusive recommendation regarding their role in the pre-hospital setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.