ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2018
Prediction of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04693923 (Capillary Refill Time Response to a Rapid Fluid Challenge in Septic Shock Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Capillary Refill Time Response to a Rapid Fluid Challenge in Septic Shock Patients: Pathophysiological Determinants, and Relation to Changes in Systemic, Regional and Microcirculatory Blood Flow
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- Superior vena cava collapsibility index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of 5% human albumin and normal saline for fluid resuscitation in sepsis induced hypotension among patients with cirrhosis (FRISC study): a randomized controlled trial.Hepatology international · 2021Trial
- The usual suspects: a pragmatic framework to identify and address reversible contributors in apparent refractory septic shock.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Pulse pressure versus continuous flow monitoring for fluid responsiveness prediction during passive leg raising: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Less-Invasive Hemodynamic and Tissue Perfusion Monitoring in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The predictive value of tidal volume challenge-induced hemodynamic changes for fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery with one-lung ventilation: a prospective observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Observational
- The time course of fluid responsiveness.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Advances in bedside imaging: lung ultrasound.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Review
- The role of the tidal volume challenge test in volume responsiveness assessment: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Review
- Observational
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Fluid Management: Finding the Perfect Balance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Predictive value of trendelenburg position and carotid ultrasound for fluid responsiveness in patients on VV-ECMO with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Tidal Volume Challenge to Assess Volume Responsiveness with Dynamic Preload Indices During Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of positive end-expiratory pressure on renal resistive index in mechanical ventilated patients.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Article
- Article
- Heart-Lungs interactions: the basics and clinical implications.Annals of intensive care · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Observational
- Inferior vena cava distensibility from subcostal and trans-hepatic imaging using both M-mode or artificial intelligence: a prospective study on mechanically ventilated patients.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluid administration is the first-line therapy in patients with acute circulatory failure. The main goal of fluid administration is to increase the cardiac output and ultimately the oxygen delivery. Nevertheless, the decision to administer fluids or not should be carefully considered, since half of critically ill patients are fluid unresponsive, and the deleterious effects of fluid overload clearly documented. Thus, except at the initial phase of hypovolemic or septic shock, where hypovolemia is constant and most of the patients responsive to the initial fluid resuscitation, it is of importance to test fluid responsiveness before administering fluids in critically ill patients. The static markers of cardiac preload cannot reliably predict fluid responsiveness, although they have been used for decades. To address this issue, some dynamic tests have been developed over the past years. All these tests consist in measuring the changes in cardiac output in response to the transient changes in cardiac preload that they induced. Most of these tests are based on the heart-lung interactions. The pulse pressure or stroke volume respiratory variations were first described, following by the respiratory variations of the vena cava diameter or of the internal jugular vein diameter. Nevertheless, all these tests are reliable only under strict conditions limiting their use in many clinical situations. Other tests such as passive leg raising or end-expiratory occlusion act as an internal volume challenge. To reliably predict fluid responsiveness, physicians must choose among these different dynamic tests, depending on their respective limitations and on the cardiac output monitoring technique which is used. In this review, we will summarize the most recent findings regarding the prediction of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.