ArticleJournal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery2018
Optimal Surgical Timing of Aspiration for Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
Article in Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic Evacuation Under Local Anesthesia for Subacute Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Older Adults.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2026Article
- Etiology-specific optimal timing of surgical intervention for intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Article
- Study on the relationship between different operation time and postoperative complications in patients with cerebral hemorrhage.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Aspiration with Fibrinolysis for Supratentorial Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhages: A Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Long-Term Outcomes Following Freehand Minimally Invasive Aspiration for Deep Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- Effects of stereotactic aspiration on brainstem hemorrhage in a case series.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Volume Reduction and Timing of Intervention Versus Functional Benefit and Survival in the MISTIE III and STICH Trials.Neurosurgery · 2021Article
- Surgical strategy for patients with supratentorial spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: minimally invasive surgery and conventional surgery.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2020Article
- Early versus delayed surgical evacuation of spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hematoma: A prospective cohort study.Surgical neurology international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMinimally invasive techniques such as stereotactic aspiration have been regarded as promising alternative methods to replace craniotomy in the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The aim of this study was to identify the optimal timing of stereotactic aspiration and analyze the factors affecting the clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 81 patients who underwent stereotactic aspiration for spontaneous supratentorial ICH at single institution. Volume of hematoma was calculated based on computed tomography scan at admission, just before aspiration, immediately after aspiration, and after continuous drainage. The neurologic outcome was compared with Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) score.
resultsThe mean volume ratio of residual hematoma was 59.5% and 17.6% immediately after aspiration and after continuous drainage for an average of 2.3 days, respectively. Delayed aspiration group showed significantly lower residual volume ratio immediately after aspiration. However, there was no significant difference in the residual volume ratio after continuous drainage. The favorable outcome of 1-month GOS 4 or 5 was significantly better in the group with delayed aspiration after more than 7 days (
conclusionThere is no difference in final residual volume of hematoma or 6-months neurologic outcome according to the surgical timing of hematoma aspiration. The only factor affecting the postoperative 6-months neurologic outcome is the final volume of remaining hematoma after drainage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.