Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30370210›Full record

ReviewPreventive medicine reports2018

A learning community approach to identifying interventions in health systems to reduce colorectal cancer screening disparities.

Lillian C Man, Melissa DiCarlo, Emily Lambert, Randa Sifri, Martha Romney, Linda Fleisher, Ronald Myers

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Preventive medicine reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An overview of reviews on strategies to reduce health inequalities.International journal for equity in health · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lillian C ManDepartment of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 834 Chestnut Street, Suite 320, Philadelphia, PA, 19107.
Melissa DiCarloCenter for Health Decisions, Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 834 Chestnut Street, Suite 314, Philadelphia, PA 19017, United States of America.
Emily LambertCenter for Health Decisions, Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 834 Chestnut Street, Suite 314, Philadelphia, PA 19017, United States of America.
Randa SifriDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Curtis building, Suite 401, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States of America.
Martha RomneyJefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University 901, Walnut, Street, 10 floor Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States of America.
Linda FleisherCenter for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 2711 South Street, Rm 13121, Philadelphia, PA 19146, United States.
Ronald MyersCenter for Health Decisions, Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 834 Chestnut Street, Suite 314, Philadelphia, PA 19017, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the United States has been increasing, screening rates are not optimal, and there are persistent disparities in CRC screening and mortality, particularly among minority patients. As most CRC screening takes place in primary care, health systems are well-positioned to address this important population health problem. However, most health systems have not actively engaged in identifying and implementing effective evidence-based intervention strategies that can raise CRC screening rates and reduce disparities. Drawing on the Collective Impact Model and the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation, our project team applied a learning community strategy to help two health systems in southeastern Pennsylvania identify evidence-based CRC screening interventions for primary care patients. Initially, this approach involved activating a coordinating team, steering committee (health system leadership and stakeholder organizations), and patient and stakeholder advisory committee to identify candidate CRC screening intervention strategies. The coordinating team guided the steering committee through a scoping review to identify seven randomized trials that identified interventions that addressed CRC screening disparities. Subsequently, the coordinating team and steering committee applied a screening intervention classification typology to select an intervention strategy that involved using an outreach strategy to provide minority patients with access to both stool blood test and colonoscopy screening. Finally, the coordinating team and steering committee engaged the health system patient and stakeholder advisory committee in planning for intervention implementation, thus taking up the challenge of reducing and important health disparity in patient populations served by the two health systems.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerHealth disparitiesMinorities

Identifiers

PMID30370210
PMCPMC6202664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.