Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30370203›Full record

Article3 Biotech2018

Phylogenetic and conservation analyses of MFS transporters.

Poonam Vishwakarma, Atanu Banerjee, Ritu Pasrija, Rajendra Prasad, Andrew M Lynn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Poonam Vishwakarma1School of Computational and Integrative Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
Atanu Banerjee1School of Computational and Integrative Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
Ritu Pasrija2Department of Biochemistry, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana India.
Rajendra Prasad3Amity Institute of Integrative Sciences and Health, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Haryana, Gurgaon, India.
Andrew M Lynn1School of Computational and Integrative Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major facilitator superfamily is one of the largest superfamily of secondary transporters present across the kingdom of life. Considering the physiological and clinical importance of MFS proteins, we attempted to explore the phylogenetic and structural aspects of the superfamily. To achieve the objectives, we performed global sequence-based analyses of MFS proteins encompassing multiple taxa. Notably, phylogenetic analysis of MFS proteins resulted in the clustering of MFS proteins based on their function, rather than lineage of the respective organisms. Additionally, we employed information theoretic measures, Relative entropy (RE) and Cumulative relative entropy (CRE) to decipher fold-specific and function-specific residues, respectively, in the MFS proteins. The residues with high RE score when mapped on to the 3D-structure of MFS transporter LacY, were found to be distributed throughout the tertiary structure of the protein. On the other hand, CRE calculation was employed to contrast two subfamilies Drug H

Indexed as

Cumulative relative entropyMajor facilitator superfamilyPhylogenyRelative entropySequence conservation

Identifiers

PMID30370203
PMCPMC6204130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.