Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30370199›Full record

Article3 Biotech2018

Microbial pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biomethanation and waste management.

Snehasish Mishra, Puneet Kumar Singh, Swagatika Dash, Ritesh Pattnaik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Gene Editing Technologies for Sugarcane Improvement: Opportunities and Limitations.Sugar tech : an international journal of sugar crops & related industries · 2022
    Article
  5. Biochemistry, Synthesis, and Applications of Bacterial Cellulose: A Review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Snehasish Mishra *School of Biotechnology, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed-to-be-University, Bhubaneswar, 751 024 India.
Puneet Kumar Singh *School of Biotechnology, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed-to-be-University, Bhubaneswar, 751 024 India.
Swagatika DashSchool of Biotechnology, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed-to-be-University, Bhubaneswar, 751 024 India.
Ritesh PattnaikSchool of Biotechnology, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed-to-be-University, Bhubaneswar, 751 024 India.ORCID 0000-0001-9467-4855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biogas obtained from organic remains entails a developed technology and an appreciable methane yield, but its use may not be sustainable. The potential methane yield of various lignocellulose biomass and the operational conditions employed are inherently reviewed. Although of lower methane yields compared to conventional substrates, agricultural biomass is a cheap option. The major challenges encountered during its biogasification are its recalcitrance nature primarily due to the presence of crystalline cellulose and lignin. This necessitates an essential pretreatment step through physical, chemical or biological interventions for enhanced biomethanation potential. Various pretreatment-physical, chemical, and biological-strategies have been developed to overcome the inherent recalcitrance of lignocellulose to anaerobic degradation. Biological pretreatment approach, however, outcompete other pretreatments due to their application in milder conditions, little corrosiveness, and lower byproduct formation. Such pretreatment importantly aids in selectively reducing the lignin content and crystalline nature of the lignocellulosic biomass, which would evidently enhance the hydrolysis and production of monomers for their further anaerobic digestion (AD) for methanation. A variety of applied biological pretreatment strategies comprises microaerobic treatments, ensiling or composting, separation of digestion stages, and pretreatments using various lignocellulolytic fungi alongside. The net energy output through such approaches is substantially more and relatively inexpensive compared to other established chemical and mechanical approaches. The present review highlights the use of biological agents including bacterial, fungal and/or their enzymes which trigger biodegradation of wastes and utilization of lignocellulose for biofuel production. Additionally, the different physical, chemical, and biological pretreatment strategies for biogas yield enhancement are presented.

Indexed as

Anaerobic digestionBiological pretreatmentBiomassBiomethanationLignocelluloseWaste management

Identifiers

PMID30370199
PMCPMC6197294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.