ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2018
Ready or not? Observations from a long-standing community engagement advisory board about investigator competencies for community-engaged research.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Community perspectives on partnering with early-stage investigators in pilot research.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Characteristics of research review boards in the context of community-academic settings: A scoping review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Community advisory board members' perspectives on their contributions to a large multistate cluster RCT: a mixed methods study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Building Community Engagement Capacity in a Transdisciplinary Population Health Research Consortium.Journal of community engagement and scholarship · 2024Article
- Integrating participants as partners in research governance and operations: an approach from theBMJ open · 2023Review
- The Stacked Community Engagement model: A practical model for developing community-engaged academic medical faculty.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Addressing the challenges of conducting community-engaged research during COVID-19: Rapid development and evaluation of a COVID-19 Research Patient and Community Advisory Board (PCAB).Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Application of community - engaged dissemination and implementation science to improve health equity.Preventive medicine reports · 2021Article
- Achieving Equity in Asian American Healthcare: Critical Issues and Solutions.Journal of Asian health · 2021Article
- Priority Populations Toolkits: Enhancing researcher readiness to work with priority populations.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Preliminary Evaluation of a Citizen Scientist Educational Curriculum Aimed at Engaging Black Men in Lung Cancer Early Detection Screening.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Preparing investigators to competently conduct community-engaged research is critical to achieving Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program goals. The purpose of this study is to describe the perspectives of members of a long-standing community engagement advisory board (CEAB) on investigators' readiness to engage communities and indicators of investigator competence in community-engaged research, in order to suggest core competencies to guide the development of CTSA-sponsored educational programs. Two 90-minute focus groups were conducted with a subset of members of a CEAB (n=19) affiliated with the Center for Clinical and Translational Science at the University of Illinois at Chicago. CEAB members identified a range of investigator skills and practices that demonstrate readiness to engage in community-engaged research. Eight competencies were identified that should be incorporated in providing education to enhance the readiness and competency of CTSA-affiliated researchers planning to engage communities in research. CEAB observations demonstrate the necessity of developing competency-based educational programs that prepare clinical and translational scientists at all levels for the important work of community-engaged research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.