ReviewStem cells international2018
Intraparenchymal Neural Stem/Progenitor Cell Transplantation for Ischemic Stroke Animals: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
Review in Stem cells international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Stem cell-based interventions for the treatment of stroke in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The effects of splenectomy in murine models of ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2022Pooled it
- Optimal therapeutic conditions for the neural stem cell-based management of ischemic stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis based on animal studies.BMC neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Lentivirus- or AAV-mediated gene therapy interventions in ischemic stroke: A systematic review of preclinicalJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022Pooled it
- Neural stem cell treatment for perinatal brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Biomaterial gels drive endogenous neurogenesis to support functional recovery after adult traumatic cortical injury.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- The Reparative Mechanisms Underlying Preclinical Neural Stem/Progenitor Cell Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.Neurology research international · 2026Review
- Angiogenic Cell Precursors and Neural Cell Precursors in Service to the Brain-Computer Interface.Cells · 2025Review
- bFGF-Chitosan "brain glue" promotes functional recovery after cortical ischemic stroke.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Mn-Based Methacrylated Gellan Gum Hydrogels for MRI-Guided Cell Delivery and Imaging.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Editing a gateway for cell therapy across the blood-brain barrier.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Review
- Stem Cell- and Cell-Based Therapies for Ischemic Stroke.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Neuroregeneration and functional recovery after stroke: advancing neural stem cell therapy toward clinical application.Neural regeneration research · 2021Article
- SUMOylation promotes survival and integration of neural stem cell grafts in ischemic stroke.EBioMedicine · 2019Article
- Promoting Brain Repair and Regeneration After Stroke: a Plea for Cell-Based Therapies.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraparenchymal transplantation of neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) has been extensively investigated in animal models of ischemic stroke. However, the reported therapeutic efficacy was inconsistent among studies. To evaluate this situation, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for preclinical studies using NSPC intraparenchymal transplantation in ischemic stroke animals. Data of study quality score, neurobehavioral (mNSS, rotarod test, and cylinder test) and histological (infarct volume) outcomes, cell therapy-related serious adverse events, and related cellular mechanisms were extracted for meta-analysis and systematic review. A total of 62 studies containing 73 treatment arms were included according to our criterion, with a mean quality score of 5.10 in 10. Among these studies, almost half of the studies claimed no adverse events of tumorigenesis. The finally pooled effect sizes for neurobehavioral and histological assessments were large (1.27 for mNSS, 1.63 for the rotarod test, 0.71 for the cylinder test, and 1.11 for infarct volume reduction). With further analysis, it was found that the administration time poststroke, NSPC donor species, and transplantation immunogenicity had close correlations with the degree of infarct volume reduction. The NSPC dosage delivered into the brain parenchyma was also negatively correlated with the effect of the cylinder test. Intriguingly, endogenous apoptosis inhibition and axonal regeneration played the most critical role in intraparenchymal NSPC transplantation among the cellular mechanisms. These results indicate that intraparenchymal NSPC transplantation is beneficial for neurobehavioral and histological improvement and is relatively safe for ischemic stroke animals. Therefore, intraparenchymal NSPC transplantation is a promising treatment for stroke patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.