Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30369784›Full record

ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2014

Prostate cancer survivorship care in the Veterans Health Administration.

Ted A Skolarus, Sarah T Hawley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bone Health in Patients With Prostate Cancer: An Evidence-Based Algorithm.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2021
    Review
  4. Health-Related Quality of Life and Toxicity After Definitive High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Among Veterans With Prostate Cancer.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2021
    Article
  5. Current use of telehealth in urology: a review.World journal of urology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ted A SkolarusDow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan.
Sarah T HawleyVA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, University of Michigan.

Funding

Optimizing Veteran-Centered Prostate Cancer Survivorship CareI01HX001129 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI HAWLEY, SARAH T · 2014 to 2016
–
Improving the prostate cancer survivorship care of veteransIK2HX001162 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI SKOLARUS, TED ALBERT · 2015 to 2018
–
HSRD VA I01 HX001129HSRD VA IK2 HX001162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The burden of prostate cancer among Veterans is substantial with over 200,000 survivors and 12,000 new diagnoses annually. Most men live with rather than die from this common and expensive disease making prostate cancer survivorship care especially important. In addition, the symptom burden after prostate cancer treatment can be substantial, last well into survivorship and lead to reduced quality of life and greater use of services. For these reasons, it is increasingly recognized that cancer survivorship care is similar to chronic disease management in requiring a combination of primary care providers and cancer specialists to deliver care over long periods of time. Because of its leadership in chronic disease care and the proportion of older men served, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is well positioned to become one of the national leaders in prostate cancer survivorship care. However, best practices and portfolios of quality indicators for prostate cancer survivorship care remain underdeveloped. More broadly, there is a limited consensus about who (primary care providers or prostate cancer specialists - urologists, radiation and medical oncologists) has primary responsibility for prostate cancer surveillance, and who manages the often substantial and lingering treatment-related side effects. Unclear roles and regional variation in the VHA cancer specialist workforce also complicate delivery of quality survivorship care. Ultimately, the design and implementation of tools to facilitate the delivery of optimal cancer survivorship care in VHA rests upon understanding how responsibility for survivorship care is managed and the barriers to quality survivorship care. Due to the expanding population of Veteran prostate cancer survivors, improving their quality of survivorship care through effective use of the VHA's provider workforce and latest telemedicine initiatives has potential to transform the national efficiency and effectiveness of cancer specialty care delivery.

Indexed as

implementationProstate cancerquality improvementsurvivorshipsymptomsveteran

Identifiers

PMID30369784
PMCPMC6201257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.