Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30369329›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Osteoprotegerin and Cardiovascular Events in High-Risk Populations: Meta-Analysis of 19 Prospective Studies Involving 27 450 Participants.

Lena Tschiderer, Gerhard Klingenschmid, Rajini Nagrani, Johann Willeit, Jari A Laukkanen, Georg Schett, Stefan Kiechl, Peter Willeit

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Low bone mineral density and coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lena Tschiderer1 Department of Neurology Medical University of Innsbruck Austria.
Gerhard Klingenschmid1 Department of Neurology Medical University of Innsbruck Austria.
Rajini Nagrani1 Department of Neurology Medical University of Innsbruck Austria.
Johann Willeit1 Department of Neurology Medical University of Innsbruck Austria.
Jari A Laukkanen2 Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition University of Eastern Finland Kuopio Finland.
Georg Schett5 Department of Internal Medicine 3 University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Erlangen Germany.
Stefan Kiechl1 Department of Neurology Medical University of Innsbruck Austria.
Peter Willeit1 Department of Neurology Medical University of Innsbruck Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Osteoprotegerin is a cytokine involved in bone metabolism as well as vascular calcification and atherogenesis. Although circulating osteoprotegerin levels are robustly associated with incident cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) in the general population, its relevance as a biomarker among populations at high CVD risk is less clear. Methods and Results Three independent reviewers systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE , and Web of Science to identify prospective studies that had recruited participants on the basis of having conditions related to high CVD risk. A total of 19 studies were eligible for inclusion, reporting on 27 450 patients with diabetes mellitus (2 studies), kidney disease (7 studies), preexisting heart disease (5 studies), or recent acute coronary syndromes (5 studies) at baseline. Over a mean follow-up of 4.2 years, 4066 CVD events were recorded. In a random-effects meta-analysis, the pooled risk ratio for CVD events comparing people in the top versus the bottom tertile of osteoprotegerin concentration was 1.30 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.50; P<0.001; I

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAngina PectorisBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityDiabetes MellitusHeart DiseasesHumansKidney DiseasesMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial RevascularizationOsteoprotegerinRiskStrokeBiomarkersOsteoprotegerincardiovascular diseasehigh‐risk populationmeta‐analysisosteoprotegerinprospective cohorts

Identifiers

PMID30369329
PMCPMC6201389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.