Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30369070›Full record

ArticleActa ophthalmologica2019

Reducing avoidable visual impairment in elderly home healthcare patients by basic ophthalmologic screening.

Ruth van Nispen, Hilde van der Aa, Frank Timmermans, Nikki Meijer, Nicole Koster, Jos de Blok, Jan Keunen, Ger van Rens

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The evaluation of an online nurse-assisted eye-screening tool in older adults receiving home healthcare.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth van NispenOphthalmology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1227-1177
Hilde van der AaOphthalmology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Frank TimmermansStichting Buurtzorg Nederland, Almelo, The Netherlands.
Nikki MeijerAlbert Schweitzer hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Nicole KosterDepartment of Research Methodology, Measurement and Data Analysis, Faculty of Behavioural, Management & Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Jos de BlokStichting Buurtzorg Nederland, Almelo, The Netherlands.
Jan KeunenRadboud University Medical Center, Ophthalmology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ger van RensOphthalmology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLStichting ALS Nederland · NLAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

Melfund Group B.V.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the prevalence of potential age-related eye conditions in elderly who are assisted by home healthcare nurses. The number of referrals to the general practitioner (GP), feasibility of screening and associations between vision loss and health outcomes were also studied.

methodsCross-sectional study in which trained home healthcare nurses screened the eyes of 151 patients [mean age 80 (50-96 years)] using their available correction, with VISION 2020 Netherlands screeners (e.g. acuity/field loss). Health outcomes were assessed with questionnaires.

resultsDistance decimal visual acuity was ≤0.3 in 20.5% (unilateral) and 19.9% (bilateral) of patients, and near visual acuity was ≤0.4 in 17.7% (unilateral) and 33.3% (bilateral). Macular dysfunction was present in 21.5% (unilateral) and 8.3% (bilateral) and peripheral field problems in 11.4% (unilateral) and 7.9% (bilateral). GP referrals were proposed in 21.5%; in 40%, the GP or ophthalmologist was already aware of eye problems. Although health problems were prominent in participants (8.6% fractures, 22% depression and 18% anxiety), no significant associations were found between vision loss and self-reported outcomes.

conclusionSixty per cent of frail elderly home healthcare patients had an ophthalmologic condition. Although a large number was already known in eye health care, >20% was referred with an unrecognized ophthalmologic problem. Basic ophthalmologic screening by home healthcare nurses might be a potentially relevant tool to reduce the burden of age-related vision loss, contributing to the joint World Health Organization - VISION 2020 initiative to eliminate avoidable blindness. Relevant health outcomes do not seem to be clearly related to having visual impairment, but rather to having general health problems.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesQuality of LifeVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPersons with Visual DisabilitiesPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesVision, Lowelderlyeye screeninghome health carequality of lifeVISION 2020visual impairment

Identifiers

PMID30369070
PMCPMC6587994
OpenAlexW2898471924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.