Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30368651›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2020

A Qualitative Exploration of Women's Experiences with a Community Health Volunteer-Led Cervical Cancer Educational Module in Migori County, Kenya.

Yujung Choi, Sandra Y Oketch, Konyin Adewumi, Elizabeth Bukusi, Megan J Huchko

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Factors, including patient education, that impact cancer treatment adherence in low- and middle-income African countries: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yujung ChoiDuke Global Health Institute, Box 90519, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. yujung.choi@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3213-8093
Sandra Y OketchCenter for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, P.O. Box 54840 00200, Mbagathi Road, Nairobi, Kenya.
Konyin AdewumiDuke Global Health Institute, Box 90519, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Elizabeth BukusiCenter for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, P.O. Box 54840 00200, Mbagathi Road, Nairobi, Kenya.
Megan J HuchkoDuke Global Health Institute, Box 90519, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Duke Institute for Health Innovation · USDuke University · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Evaluating a community-driven cervical cancer prevention model in western KenyaR01CA188428 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HUCHKO, MEGAN J. · 2014 to 2018
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection and treatment of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical precancer through screening programs is an effective way to reduce cervical cancer deaths. However, high cervical cancer mortality persists in low- and middle-income countries. As screening programs become more widely available, it is essential to understand how knowledge about cervical cancer and perceived disease risk impacts screening uptake and acceptability. We evaluated women's experiences with a cervical cancer education strategy led by community health volunteers (CHVs) in Migori County, Kenya, as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial of cervical cancer screening implementation strategies. The educational modules employed simple language and images and sought to increase understanding of the relationship between HPV and cervical cancer, the mechanisms of self-collected HPV testing, and the importance of cervical cancer screening. Modules took place in three different contexts throughout the study: (1) during community mobilization; (2) prior to screening in either community health campaigns or health facilities; and (3) prior to treatment. Between January and September 2016, we conducted in-depth interviews with 525 participants to assess their experience with various aspects of the screening program. After the context-specific educational modules, women reported increased awareness of cervical cancer screening and willingness to screen, described HPV- and cervical cancer-related stigma and emphasized the use of educational modules to reduce stigma. Some misconceptions about cervical cancer were evident. With effective and context-specific training, lay health workers, such as CHVs, can help bridge the gap between cervical cancer screening uptake and acceptability.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Education as TopicAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerEarly Intervention, EducationalFemaleHealth PromotionHumansKenyaMiddle AgedModels, EducationalPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPublic HealthUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical cancer screeningCommunity health volunteer educationHPV testingIn-depth interviewsKenya

Identifiers

PMID30368651
PMCPMC6920575
OpenAlexW2898467677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.