Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30368629›Full record

SynthesisJournal of autism and developmental disorders2019

Should Heritage Languages be Incorporated into Interventions for Bilingual Individuals with Neurodevelopmental Disorders? A Systematic Review.

Nataly Lim, Mark F O'Reilly, Jeff Sigafoos, Katherine Ledbetter-Cho, Giulio E Lancioni

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nataly LimThe University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX,, USA. nlim94@utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9449-5996
Mark F O'ReillyThe University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX,, USA.
Jeff SigafoosVictoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Katherine Ledbetter-ChoThe University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX,, USA.
Giulio E LancioniUniversità degli studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
The University of Texas at Austin · USTexas State University · USUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITVictoria University of Wellington · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Special education policies recognize the need for developing and preserving the heritage languages of individuals with disabilities. Yet there seems to be a disconnect between policy and practice. Should the heritage languages of bilingual individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders be incorporated into interventions? This review evaluated 18 studies that examined the effects of heritage language instruction on treatment outcomes for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders. Overall, results suggest a small effect favoring interventions delivered in the heritage language versus interventions delivered solely in the majority language. In general, studies were also found to be of high-quality according to What Works Clearinghouse Standards. Findings are discussed in terms of recommendations for future research and practice.

Indexed as

MultilingualismEducation, SpecialHumansLanguageMaleNeurodevelopmental DisordersPersons with DisabilitiesAutism spectrum disorderBilingualismCommunication disordersGlobal developmental delayIntellectual disabilityLanguage of instructionNeurodevelopmental disabilities

Identifiers

PMID30368629
OpenAlexW2898331998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.