ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2018
Using clinical Natural Language Processing for health outcomes research: Overview and actionable suggestions for future advances.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
102 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Using machine learning methods to predict all-cause somatic hospitalizations in adults: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Natural language processing with machine learning methods to analyze unstructured patient-reported outcomes derived from electronic health records: A systematic review.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Transforming epilepsy research: A systematic review on natural language processing applications.Epilepsia · 2023Pooled it
- The role of machine learning in developing non-magnetic resonance imaging based biomarkers for multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Pooled it
- Use of unstructured text in prognostic clinical prediction models: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Pooled it
- Natural Language Processing Applications in the Clinical Neurosciences: A Machine Learning Augmented Systematic Review.Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement · 2022Pooled it
- The reporting quality of natural language processing studies: systematic review of studies of radiology reports.BMC medical imaging · 2021Pooled it
- Can antiepileptic efficacy and epilepsy variables be studied from electronic health records? A review of current approaches.Seizure · 2021Pooled it
- The Potential of Research Drawing on Clinical Free Text to Bring Benefits to Patients in the United Kingdom: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Pooled it
- Two-Stage Extraction of Clinical Course Information From Psychiatric Discharge Summaries Using Fine-Tuned Large Language Models: Cross-Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of a text-matching algorithm to identify patients with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis from radiology reports at five medical centers.Thrombosis research · 2026Article
- Article
- Natural Language Processing of Unstructured Healthcare Data for Predicting Heart Failure in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning in the analysis of mental health at work: a scoping review.Journal of occupational health · 2026Article
- Integrating NLP to Enhance Algorithmic Identification of Metastatic and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in Large Claims-Based Studies.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Natural Language Processing to Automate Cerebrovascular Event Identification in Stroke Alerts.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Design and implementation of a natural language processing system at the point of care: MiADE (medical information AI data extractor).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Large Language Models to Identify Stroke Subtypes Within Unstructured Electronic Health Record Data.Stroke · 2025Article
- Enhancing substance use detection in clinical notes with large language models.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2025Article
- RADEX: a rule-based clinical and radiology data extraction tool demonstrated on thyroid ultrasound reports.European radiology · 2025Article
42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The importance of incorporating Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods in clinical informatics research has been increasingly recognized over the past years, and has led to transformative advances. Typically, clinical NLP systems are developed and evaluated on word, sentence, or document level annotations that model specific attributes and features, such as document content (e.g., patient status, or report type), document section types (e.g., current medications, past medical history, or discharge summary), named entities and concepts (e.g., diagnoses, symptoms, or treatments) or semantic attributes (e.g., negation, severity, or temporality). From a clinical perspective, on the other hand, research studies are typically modelled and evaluated on a patient- or population-level, such as predicting how a patient group might respond to specific treatments or patient monitoring over time. While some NLP tasks consider predictions at the individual or group user level, these tasks still constitute a minority. Owing to the discrepancy between scientific objectives of each field, and because of differences in methodological evaluation priorities, there is no clear alignment between these evaluation approaches. Here we provide a broad summary and outline of the challenging issues involved in defining appropriate intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation methods for NLP research that is to be used for clinical outcomes research, and vice versa. A particular focus is placed on mental health research, an area still relatively understudied by the clinical NLP research community, but where NLP methods are of notable relevance. Recent advances in clinical NLP method development have been significant, but we propose more emphasis needs to be placed on rigorous evaluation for the field to advance further. To enable this, we provide actionable suggestions, including a minimal protocol that could be used when reporting clinical NLP method development and its evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.