Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30367674›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2018

A simulated patient evaluation of pharmacist's performance in a men's mental health program.

Andrea L Murphy, David M Gardner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea L MurphyCollege of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, 5968 College St., PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada. andrea.murphy@dal.ca.
David M GardnerCollege of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, 5968 College St., PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Headstrong program, a pharmacy based men's mental health promotion program, was designed to enhance pharmacists' care of men with mental illness and addictions and was focused on six conditions. A simulated patient (SP) encounter on insomnia was used to evaluate pharmacist's performance as a part of the Headstrong program.

resultsSix Headstrong pharmacists consented to participate in the SP encounter as part of the evaluation of the Headstrong program. Pharmacists' mean scores in most categories that were evaluated (e.g., pre-supply/assessment score, sleep score) were lower than expected. In assessing the SP during the encounter, pharmacists' mean score was 5.7 (SD 2.0) of a possible 13 points. No pharmacists asked about the SP's age, availability of other supports, allergies, and whether they had an existing relationship with a pharmacist. One pharmacist inquired about medical conditions, and two asked about pre-existing mental health conditions. Three pharmacists inquired about concurrent medications. The Headstrong program was discussed by half of the pharmacists and a resource recommended by the Headstrong program was suggested by one pharmacist. Several pharmacists used self-disclosure as a mechanism to support rapport building. Overall, the SP felt cared for and respected by the pharmacists and had confidence in their knowledge.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient SatisfactionPatient SimulationProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultCommunity Pharmacy ServicesHealth PromotionHumansMental DisordersPharmacistsProgram EvaluationSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersCommunity pharmacy servicesMental disordersPharmacistsSimulated patients

Identifiers

PMID30367674
PMCPMC6204042
OpenAlexW2898264472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.