Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30367640›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2018

Bacterial contamination of platelets for transfusion: strategies for prevention.

Jerrold H Levy, Matthew D Neal, Jay H Herman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Alterations in RNA Expression Profile FollowingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Thrombocytopenia in Sepsis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Platelet Storage-Problems, Improvements, and New Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jerrold H LevyDuke University Hospital, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. jerrold.levy@duke.edu.
Matthew D NealUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Jay H HermanThomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S. 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.

Funding

Mechanistic Elucidation and Targeted Therapy of Platelet Dysfunction After TraumaR35GM119526 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI NEAL, MATTHEW D · 2016 to 2025
$3.9M
Cerus CorpNIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Platelet transfusions carry greater risks of infection, sepsis, and death than any other blood product, owing primarily to bacterial contamination. Many patients may be at particular risk, including critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. This narrative review provides an overview of the problem and an update on strategies for the prevention, detection, and reduction/inactivation of bacterial contaminants in platelets. Bacterial contamination and septic transfusion reactions are major sources of morbidity and mortality. Between 1:1000 and 1:2500 platelet units are bacterially contaminated. The skin bacterial microflora is a primary source of contamination, and enteric contaminants are rare but may be clinically devastating, while platelet storage conditions can support bacterial growth. Donor selection, blood diversion, and hemovigilance are effective but have limitations. Biofilm-producing species can adhere to biological and non-biological surfaces and evade detection. Primary bacterial culture testing of apheresis platelets is in routine use in the US. Pathogen reduction/inactivation technologies compatible with platelets use ultraviolet light-based mechanisms to target nucleic acids of contaminating bacteria and other pathogens. These methods have demonstrated safety and efficacy and represent a proactive approach for inactivating contaminants before transfusion to prevent transfusion-transmitted infections. One system, which combines ultraviolet A and amotosalen for broad-spectrum pathogen inactivation, is approved in both the US and Europe. Current US Food and Drug Administration recommendations advocate enhanced bacterial testing or pathogen reduction/inactivation strategies (or both) to further improve platelet safety. Risks of bacterial contamination of platelets and transfusion-transmitted infections have been significantly mitigated, but not eliminated, by improvements in prevention and detection strategies. Regulatory-approved technologies for pathogen reduction/inactivation have further enhanced the safety of platelet transfusions. Ongoing development of these technologies holds great promise.

Indexed as

Bacterial LoadDrug ContaminationFurocoumarinsHumansPhotosensitizing AgentsPlatelet TransfusionTransfusion ReactionUltraviolet RaysamotosalenFurocoumarinsPhotosensitizing AgentsBacterial contaminationBacterial detectionHemovigilancePathogen reduction/inactivationPlateletsPrevention strategiesSeptic transfusion reaction (STR)TransfusionTransfusion-transmitted bacterial infection (TTBI)

Identifiers

PMID30367640
PMCPMC6204059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.