Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30367591›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Drug response prediction model using a hierarchical structural component modeling method.

Sungtae Kim, Sungkyoung Choi, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Youngsoo Kim, Seungyeoun Lee, Taesung Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sungtae KimInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South Korea.
Sungkyoung ChoiInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South Korea.
Jung-Hwan YoonDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Youngsoo KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Seungyeoun LeeDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Sejong University, Seoul, 05006, South Korea.
Taesung ParkInterdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South Korea. tspark@stats.snu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComponent-based structural equation modeling methods are now widely used in science, business, education, and other fields. This method uses unobservable variables, i.e., "latent" variables, and structural equation model relationships between observable variables. Here, we applied this structural equation modeling method to biologically structured data. To identify candidate drug-response biomarkers, we first used proteomic peptide-level data, as measured by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS), for liver cancer patients. MRM-MS is a highly sensitive and selective method for proteomic targeted quantitation of peptide abundances in complex biological samples.

resultsWe developed a component-based drug response prediction model, having the advantage that it first combines collapsed peptide-level data into protein-level information, facilitating subsequent biological interpretation. Our model also uses an alternating least squares algorithm, to efficiently estimate both coefficients of peptides and proteins. This approach also considers correlations between variables, without constraint, by a multiple testing problem. Using estimated peptide and protein coefficients, we selected significant protein biomarkers by permutation testing, resulting in our model for predicting liver cancer response to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib.

conclusionsUsing data from a cohort of liver cancer patients, we then "fine-tuned" our model to successfully predict drug responses, as demonstrated by a high area under the curve (AUC) score. Such drug response prediction models may eventually find clinical translation in identifying individual patients likely to respond to specific therapies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, StatisticalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMass SpectrometryMiddle AgedProteomicsSorafenibAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorSorafenibBiomarkersComponent-based structural equation modelingDrug responseLiver cancerMultiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS)Prediction modelSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID30367591
PMCPMC6101092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.